May 9, 2024 - PGNY
Progyny, the fertility benefits giant, has always projected an image of unwavering growth. But buried beneath the optimistic rhetoric of their recent earnings call (Q1 2024 Transcript) lies a shadow, a subtle shift that suggests a deeper vulnerability than they are letting on. While analysts focus on the temporary treatment mix shift and expected rebound, a closer look at the data reveals a potential connection between the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on abortion and Progyny's utilization rates, a connection that could have significant long-term implications.
Progyny's narrative emphasizes the strength of macro trends – rising infertility rates, delayed family building, and the growing importance of family-building benefits to employers. These trends are undeniable. However, they do not operate in a vacuum. Social and political factors can profoundly influence individuals' decisions regarding fertility treatment, and Progyny's data hints at exactly such an influence stemming from the Alabama ruling.
The company acknowledges a "modest dip" in utilization during March, coinciding with the national conversation sparked by the Alabama decision. This dip, they suggest, was "more pronounced in states with the most restrictive laws for women's reproductive healthcare." Progyny attributes this to members proceeding with "greater caution" due to uncertainty surrounding access to fertility care.
While Progyny downplays this phenomenon, framing it as a temporary blip, the potential ramifications are far more substantial. If the Alabama ruling, or similar legal battles in other states, contributes to a sustained chilling effect on utilization, Progyny's growth trajectory could be fundamentally altered.
Here's where the numbers come into play. Progyny reported a 0.46% female utilization rate in Q1 2024, down from 0.48% in Q1 2023. This seemingly small difference translates to a significant revenue impact. Assuming an average revenue per female user of $10,000 (a conservative estimate), a 0.02% decline in utilization across Progyny's 6.7 million covered lives represents a potential $13.4 million revenue shortfall.
This figure is particularly striking considering Progyny's initial Q1 2024 revenue guidance was based on utilization levels "pacing on virtually identical track as it had been in the prior year period." The company later revised their full-year revenue guidance down, attributing it partly to the utilization dip, but their projections for the second half of 2024 assume a return to utilization levels near 2023 figures.
This optimistic outlook relies on the assumption that the cautionary behavior observed in March will dissipate. However, the legal and political landscape surrounding reproductive healthcare is far from settled. Further legal challenges and legislative action in various states could perpetuate uncertainty and anxiety among potential fertility patients, hindering Progyny's ability to reach their ambitious growth targets.
Furthermore, Progyny's geographic expansion strategy could be indirectly impacted by the Alabama ruling. The company has highlighted its efforts to penetrate new markets, including labor and federal government populations. However, if utilization rates remain suppressed in states with restrictive reproductive healthcare laws, Progyny's ability to achieve the same level of market penetration and revenue generation in these areas could be compromised.
This potential vulnerability raises a critical question for investors: Is Progyny adequately factoring the impact of the shifting legal landscape into their long-term projections? While the company touts the strength of macro trends, their data suggests a tangible, albeit subtle, influence from the Alabama ruling on member behavior. If this trend persists, Progyny's growth narrative could require a substantial reassessment.
It's worth noting that Progyny has never faced a prolonged period of sustained utilization decline. The company's success has been built on a consistently expanding user base and high levels of member engagement. However, the current situation presents a novel challenge, one that demands a more nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between social, political, and personal factors influencing fertility decisions.
Whether Progyny can navigate this new landscape while maintaining its impressive growth trajectory remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the Alabama ruling has cast a shadow of uncertainty over the company's future, a shadow that deserves far more attention than it is currently receiving.
The chart below compares Progyny's reported and projected female utilization rates. The decline in Q1 2024 and the range of projections for the remainder of the year highlight the uncertainty surrounding future utilization levels.
"Fun Fact: The average cost of a single IVF cycle in the US is $12,000 - $17,000, not including medication, which can add another $3,000 - $5,000. This highlights the significant financial burden faced by many individuals seeking fertility treatment and underscores the importance of fertility benefits offered by companies like Progyny. (Source: RESOLVE)"