February 19, 2016 - MNHVF
Something strange is happening in the world of salmon farming. While the price of salmon is skyrocketing and demand is through the roof, there's an unsettling undercurrent of concern rippling through the industry. Lurking beneath the surface of Marine Harvest (now known as Mowi)'s seemingly successful Q4 2015 report is a silent threat that could reshape the future of salmon production: the escalating challenge of biological factors.
Yes, you read that right. As consumers are happily shelling out record prices for their favorite pink fish, the very foundation of this booming industry is being threatened by a confluence of biological challenges. Sea lice infestations, algae blooms, and diseases like Pancreas Disease (PD) and Cardiomyopathy Syndrome (CMS) are emerging as formidable foes for salmon farmers across the globe.
While most analysts are focused on the positive aspects of the report—record profits for the Feed segment, strong demand in Europe and Asia, and a rebound in Chilean salmon prices—CEO Alf-Helge Aarskog's repeated pronouncements of concern regarding "biology going forward" paint a starkly different picture. It's a warning that shouldn't be ignored.
The cost of managing these biological threats is astronomical. In Norway alone, the industry is estimated to spend between NOK 3 billion and NOK 5 billion annually on sea lice mitigation alone. Add to that the cost of lost fish due to mortality and treatment-related stress, and the numbers quickly become eye-watering.
Aarskog's words about the need to change things around if the industry wants to achieve its growth targets hint at a dire truth: if these biological challenges aren't addressed, the future of salmon farming is in jeopardy.
A closer look at the Q4 2015 transcript reveals that exceptional items for Norway's Farming segment are at an all-time high. This signals the increasing financial burden of combating these biological threats. Additionally, the company guides on high costs for the first half of 2016, further reinforcing the idea that these challenges are far from resolved.
Region | Q4 2015 Operational EBIT per Kilo (NOK) | Biological Challenges |
---|---|---|
Region South (Norway) | 8.9 | PD, CMS, Sea Lice |
Region West (Norway) | 16.2 | Sea Lice |
Region Mid (Norway) | 4.5 | Severe Sea Lice Infestations |
Region North (Norway) | (Data not available in the provided transcript) | Improved Sea Lice Situation |
Scotland | (Impacted by Rosyth losses, see below) | Sea Lice, Algae Blooms |
Canada | (Data not available in the provided transcript, but profitable) | Biological Challenges Expected |
Chile | (Losses incurred, see chart) | Biomass Reduction Progress, Need for Stronger Regulations |
Faroe Islands | 16 | Sea Lice Concerns |
Ireland | Breakeven | Cost Increases Expected |
The problem isn't limited to Norway. Aarskog explicitly mentions concerns about biology in Scotland, Canada, and even the Faroe Islands, highlighting the widespread nature of the problem. While Chile is finally showing signs of reducing biomass—a key factor in mitigating biological risks—the lack of strong regulatory action leaves the industry vulnerable to a repeat of past mistakes.
Chilean salmon farming has been particularly hard hit by biological challenges in recent years. The chart below illustrates the operational losses incurred in Chile during 2015, emphasizing the severity of the situation.
So, what does this mean for the future of salmon farming? Is this the end of affordable salmon?
Mowi, to their credit, is taking these challenges seriously. They're investing in new technologies like the "egg" concept—a closed-containment system designed to mitigate sea lice, escapees, and even feed spills. If successful, this could be a game-changer for the industry, offering a path towards sustainable and cost-effective production. They're also expanding their own feed production, aiming for greater control over feed quality and a reduction in reliance on external suppliers.
But innovation alone might not be enough. The industry needs to prioritize responsible growth and regulatory action to address these looming biological threats. Failing to do so could lead to escalating costs, compromised fish welfare, and ultimately, a diminished supply of salmon, making it a luxury good rather than a staple on our dinner plates.
Biological challenges (sea lice, algae blooms, diseases) are posing a significant threat to the long-term sustainability and profitability of salmon farming. Current mitigation strategies are proving costly and inadequate in controlling these threats. While innovation is underway, it may not be enough to address the scope of the problem. Without a combined effort towards responsible growth and stricter regulatory action, the industry faces escalating costs, compromised fish welfare, and a potential decline in supply, potentially turning salmon into a luxury good.
Exceptional items for Norway's Farming segment in Q4 2015 are at an all-time high. The company guides on high costs for the first half of 2016 due to biological factors. Mowi reports concerns about biology in Scotland, Canada, and the Faroe Islands. Chile, while showing progress in biomass reduction, remains vulnerable due to lack of strong regulations.
The future of salmon farming hangs in the balance. While the current market may be painted in rosy hues of high prices and strong demand, the whispers of concern about "biology going forward" cannot be ignored. The industry needs to confront this silent threat head-on if it wants to secure its future and keep salmon on our plates—and within reach of our wallets.
"Fun Fact: Salmon are anadromous, meaning they are born in freshwater, migrate to the ocean, and then return to freshwater to spawn. This incredible journey can span thousands of miles and involves remarkable adaptations to survive in both environments."