Absorption mode: management is racing to take on business that is already arriving

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the company's central challenge RIGHT NOW is ABSORBING business that is already arriving or already committed — rather than finding, winning, or stimulating demand — AND that the company is actively mobilizing NOW (spending, hiring, building, expanding, or reorganizing, with real steps already underway) to take on that business? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent posture with both halves present as a current reality: (1) real business is pressing in on the company faster than it can currently handle — for example orders, customers, projects, patients, contracts, or volumes that are already won, already committed, or already showing up, which the company must now serve, deliver, produce, install, onboard, staff, or fulfill — so that the binding question is capability to absorb it, not whether the demand exists; and (2) management describes concrete expansion actions already in motion to raise that capability — such as capacity being added, people being hired and trained, facilities or systems being brought online, or the organization being scaled up — and treats this race to absorb the incoming business as the company's main operational priority right now. Both halves may take whatever specific form fits the industry; what matters is the overall posture of a company straining to grow into demand that is already at the door. Answer NO if management's energy on the call is chiefly about winning, stimulating, defending, or forecasting demand, however optimistic the tone. NO if the expansion described is routine maintenance, ordinary annual investment, or a build justified mainly by projected or hoped-for future demand rather than by business already arriving or committed. NO if the pressure comes mainly from shortages of inputs the company buys rather than from its own business volume. NO if the mobilization is only planned, contemplated, or contingent rather than already underway. NO if the company is chiefly cutting costs, consolidating, or managing weakness. NO if the posture appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.