Better business coming in than going out

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the business the company is TAKING IN RIGHT NOW is of visibly HIGHER QUALITY than the business it is finishing, replacing, or letting run off — that is, does management contrast the character of its NEW incoming work, orders, contracts, customers, products, or engagements against the OLDER business still sitting in its reported results, and indicate that as the old naturally rolls off and the new becomes a bigger share, the company's results will improve on the strength of business ALREADY being taken in today? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the industry, ONE coherent phenomenon with both halves present as a present-tense reality: (1) AN IN-VERSUS-OUT QUALITY CONTRAST, STATED BY MANAGEMENT. Management describes the business currently entering the company as better than what it is replacing — better priced, better margined, better terms, longer duration, more valuable work, stronger or higher-quality customers, a richer product or service mix, or otherwise economically superior — and makes the comparison against the company's OWN existing or outgoing book, not against competitors or the market. The forms vary widely: new orders or bookings coming in at better economics than the work being completed; new contracts, policies, leases, loans, or engagements written on better terms than those expiring; the sales mix of what is being sold now visibly richer than the mix still dominating reported results; lower-quality, lower-margin, or problematic business being deliberately allowed to run off while better business fills its place; or management explaining that what is in the backlog, book, or pipeline of committed work today carries better economics than what is currently being recognized. (2) THE TURNOVER IS REAL, CURRENT, AND ALREADY IN THE NUMBERS' FUTURE. The higher-quality intake must be described as actually being received, signed, booked, or written NOW — real transactions already happening, not aspirations to move upmarket or plans to improve mix — and management should convey, directly or plainly in substance, that reported results still largely reflect the older, lower-quality business, so the improvement arrives as the mix naturally turns over, without depending on new demand, market recovery, or events not yet secured. Answer NO if management discusses only overall demand strength, volume growth, or a good quarter without contrasting the quality of incoming business against outgoing. NO if the improvement in economics comes chiefly from raising prices to pass through costs, or from market prices moving favorably, rather than from a genuine change in the character of the business being taken in. NO if the better mix is only targeted, planned, or hoped for rather than already arriving. NO if the contrast is purely between a good quarter and a bad quarter, or between this company and competitors, rather than between the company's own incoming and outgoing business. NO if the new business's superiority is asserted only generically ("higher quality growth", "improving mix") with nothing concrete about what makes the incoming business better. NO if the reported results already fully reflect the better mix, with no meaningful turnover still ahead. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.