Break from their own history

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management itself declare that what is happening in the business RIGHT NOW is a POSITIVE DEPARTURE FROM THE COMPANY'S OWN HISTORICAL PATTERN — telling investors, in its own words, that the current level, pace, breadth, or character of business is unlike what this company has experienced before — AND does management anchor that claim in specific, present-tense operating facts rather than in hopes or projections? Answer YES when BOTH halves come through in management's own voice, in whatever form fits the business: (1) AN EXPLICIT SELF-COMPARISON THAT BREAKS THE PATTERN. Management compares the present business against the company's OWN prior experience and says the present is different in kind or in degree — for example: activity, demand, orders, adoption, wins, utilization, or momentum described as the strongest, broadest, or fastest the company has seen; a pace or level management says it has not experienced before or that departs from how this business has always behaved; customer behavior, market reception, or operating conditions that management explicitly contrasts with the company's own past and describes as a genuine change rather than a good stretch; or management saying in substance that the historical rhythm, seasonality, cyclicality, or ceiling that used to govern this business is not governing it now. The comparison must be against the company's own history — not against last year alone, not against competitors, and not against the industry — and it must be management's own framing, offered as a meaningful characterization of the period rather than a passing superlative. (2) THE CLAIM STANDS ON THINGS ALREADY HAPPENING. Management supports the departure with concrete, current operating substance — real orders, customers, volumes, activity, engagements, or behavior in the recent period that it points to as the evidence — so the break from pattern is presented as an observed fact about the business today, not a forecast, a pipeline, an addressable market, or an expectation of what is coming. Answer NO if the call is ordinary strong-quarter reporting — good or record results described in routine terms — without management explicitly framing the present as a departure from the company's own historical pattern. NO if the only self-comparison is a single boilerplate superlative (such as one mention of "record revenue") recited in passing without management treating the break from its own past as part of the story of the period. NO if the departure is only expected, guided, or hoped for rather than already being experienced. NO if management attributes the unusual strength chiefly to a one-time event, an easy comparison, catch-up, pull-forward, seasonality, or a temporary condition it expects to fade. NO if the claimed change is negative or mixed rather than favorable. NO if the pattern-break idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.