Question Bank › Newly won customer expanding beyond initial scop

Newly won customer expanding beyond initial scope

Calls Tested
499
Answered YES
7
Hit Rate
1.4%
rare by design

Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2022 call 2022-07-28 B+

← Back to the full INVH analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: Does management state that a specifically identified customer (named, or clearly identifiable as a particular account, program, or logo) which the company recently won or onboarded has already expanded its relationship with the company beyond the original scope — for example by adding more products, modules, services, sites, divisions, geographies, or a larger deployment than the initial deal — with management explicitly describing that expansion as having already happened or begun? Answer YES only if all of the following are present in management's own words: (1) a specific, identifiable customer relationship (not 'customers generally,' 'several clients,' or an unnamed aggregate trend); (2) the relationship is described as recently won, new, or recently onboarded (roughly within the past year or so); and (3) management affirmatively states that this same customer has already broadened or deepened its usage or purchases beyond the initial contract, pilot, or product — the expansion must be stated as fact or as already underway, not merely proposed, hoped for, or expected. Answer NO if management only discusses winning new customers without any expansion of an existing one; NO if expansion is described only as a general pattern across the customer base with no specific identifiable account; NO if the expansion is only a future opportunity, pipeline item, or something the customer 'could' do; NO if the deepened relationship is with a long-standing customer rather than a recently won one; and NO if only an analyst characterizes the expansion and management does not itself confirm it. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
NGMS NeoGames S.A. Q2 2021 2021-08-12 B+
ZS Zscaler, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-06-06 B+
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
MODN Model N, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-11-07 F
TASR TASER International's Q2 2016 2016-08-04 B+
CBR Ciber's Q1 2016 2016-05-05 F
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

More from the question bank

Insider capital committed alongside shareholCustomers locking in longer commitmentsSelf-blame with named internal fixCompetitor stumble named, demand inboundNewly elevated priority replacing old playboCapacity sold out ahead of buildAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.