Question Bank › Quietly replacing the old way

Quietly replacing the old way

Quietly replacing the old way: customers are switching to the company from an entrenched alternative, and the switching

Calls Tested
485
Answered YES
26
Hit Rate
5.4%
rare by design

Zhihu Inc. (ZH) — this company's answers

NO on the Q3 2021 call 2021-11-22 D
The model's full reasoning — Q3 2021 call → NO我们根据提供的财报电话会议记录，判断管理层是否描述了客户正在从现有替代方案转向公司，并且这种转变仍处于早期阶段。 在记录中，管理层讨论了内容商业化解决方案（CCS）的增长、广告增长、付费会员增长等。他们提到“content-commerce solutions and paid membership combined to contribute over 55% of the total revenue”，以及“CCS increased by more than five times”等。但这是否涉及从现有替代方案切换？管理层没有明确提到客户从竞争对手或旧技术转向他们。他们谈论的是增长，但没有描述替代或取代现有供应商。 在问答环节，有分析师问及广告垂直领域，管理层提到“merchant client the advertisement clients are switching their marketing expenses from traditional media platforms to some platforms like us”，这暗示广告客户从传统媒体转向他们，但这是否是“switching”且“early stages”？管理层说“we benefit those, we've benefited a lot because our, our merchant client the advertisement clients are switching their marketing expenses from traditional media platforms to some platforms like us which we can produce very nice contents and deliver nice and – state content-commerce solution.” 这确实描述了广告客户从传统媒体转向他们，但这是否是“early stages”？管理层没有明确说大部分潜在转换者尚未转换。他们只是说增长强劲。 另外，关于视频内容，管理层提到“joint creation”等，但没有明确说替代旧方式。 整体上，管理层描述了增长，但没有明确描述一个正在进行的替代过程，且大部分潜在转换者尚未转换。他们提到广告客户从传统媒体转向，但未说明这是否是早期阶段。因此，我认为答案应为NO。 但让我们仔细看：管理层说“switching their marketing expenses from traditional media platforms to some platforms like us”，这确实是一种替代，但未提及早期阶段。而且，这可能是分析师问题中提到的，但管理层确认了。然而，问题要求“management's own words convey... ONE coherent phenomenon as a present-tense reality: a substitution is underway... and this company is the one being substituted IN.” 这里管理层确实说了广告客户正在从传统媒体转向他们，但未说“early stages”。而且，这可能是广告行业的一般趋势，但管理层没有说大部分尚未转换。 另外，在回答中，管理层提到“we believe that those will deliver better and better results going forward”，但未明确说早期。 因此，我认为答案应为NO，因为缺乏“early stages”的表述，且没有明确说大部分潜在转换者尚未转换。 但让我们再检查：在回答关于广告垂直领域时，管理层说“they all had very stable and nice growth of 80% year-on-year”，这可能是增长，但未提及替代。 在关于视频的讨论中，管理层说“we have since improved popularity of high quality videos”，但未提及替代。 因此，我认为答案应为NO。

← Back to the full ZH analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that customers are currently SWITCHING TO THE COMPANY FROM AN ENTRENCHED ALTERNATIVE THEY PREVIOUSLY RELIED ON — abandoning or displacing an incumbent supplier, a legacy product or technology, an older method, or an established way of doing things in order to adopt what this company sells — AND does management convey that this switching is still in its early stages, with most of the potential switchers not yet converted? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent phenomenon as a present-tense reality: a substitution is underway in the company's market, and this company is the one being substituted IN. Any genuine expression of this counts, and the form varies widely across industries. For example — management describing customers replacing a competitor's or incumbent's product with theirs; customers moving off a legacy technology, material, method, platform, or practice onto the company's; buyers who used to do the work themselves, or do without, now adopting the company's offering instead; customers consolidating onto the company after dropping other vendors; management noting that wins are coming at the direct expense of a named or clearly implied alternative that used to be the default; or management describing that the conversation in its market has shifted from "whether to switch" to "how fast to switch." Two things should come through in management's own voice. First, THE SWITCHING IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING NOW — real customers who have already moved, described as a recurring pattern in current business (won accounts, displaced incumbents, conversions completed, replacements underway), not a hope that switching will someday begin. Second, THE INSTALLED BASE OF THE OLD WAY IS STILL LARGE — management conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that what has switched so far is small relative to what is still out there using the old alternative, so the substitution has substantial distance left to run. Answer NO if management simply reports strong demand, a good quarter, or growth in a market with no incumbent or prior alternative being displaced. NO if the switching is only anticipated, targeted, or described as a future opportunity rather than already occurring. NO if the only evidence is one isolated account win with no sense of a broader substitution pattern. NO if the displacement described is essentially complete, with the old alternative already largely gone. NO if the switching is driven by a one-time event — a single competitor's collapse, a temporary shortage, a forced recall — that management expects to normalize rather than an ongoing substitution. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
IFS Intercorp Financial Services Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-14 C+
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
APPS Digital Turbine, Inc. Q1 2024 2023-08-08 D
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Q2 2023 2023-07-28 B+
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
BLZE Backblaze, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-11 D
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
SGRY Surgery Partners, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 B+
BIG Big Lots, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-27 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
IRTC iRhythm Technologies, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-07 C+
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
RNW ReNew Energy Global Plc Q2 2022 2021-11-18 C
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
INST Instructure's Q4 2017 2018-02-12 B+
HOLX Hologic, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-08 D
BLKB Blackbaud, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-02 B+
EVBN Evans Bancorp, Inc. Q4 2016 2017-02-06 B+
BDC Belden Inc. Q4 2016 2017-02-02 B

How the model reasoned

BLKB · Q1 2017 → YESThe question is: Does management describe that customers are currently SWITCHING TO THE COMPANY FROM AN ENTRENCHED ALTERNATIVE THEY PREVIOUSLY RELIED ON, and that this switching is still in its early ...YES Management describes customers switching from entrenched alternatives (legacy hardware systems, older Raiser's Edge versions, standalone point solutions) to Blackbaud's cloud solutions like NXT, with examples of recent replacements and migrations already occurring. They also note that much of the potential remains, as the installed base of legacy methods is still large 25% of subscription revenue, and they describe the opportunity as "really early days" with substantial distance left to run. This fits the criteria of a present-tense substitution pattern in the market, not just future hope. The high retention on their own base (93%) combined with declining maintenance revenue shows the shift is active and ongoing, while new wins against competitors and legacy alternatives are happening now. The TAM of $7 billion with hundreds of thousands of addressable customers reinforces that switching is early-stage relative to the total opportunity. The answer is YES. The question is answered with YES. The question is answered with YES.
BLZE · Q3 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management describe that customers are currently SWITCHING TO THE COMPANY FROM AN ENTRENCHED ALTERNATIVE THEY PREVIOUSLY RELIED ON, and that this switching is still in its early ...YES The transcript shows management describing current customer switches from entrenched alternatives (AWS for urlscan.io; Synology NAS/on-prem for Fiture; broader AWS and on-prem users), with these as real, ongoing patterns. They explicitly note that much of the potential remains ("so much of the world's data is still on-premises" and "customers that are inside of AWS and others"), confirming the substitution is early-stage relative to the large installed base. This is conveyed directly in Gleb's responses as a present-tense reality, not merely anticipated. The two examples plus the broader opportunity framing establish a coherent substitution underway, with the company being substituted in. The investor question on percentages and Gleb's reply reinforce the pattern without contradicting the current movement. No single-event or future-only framing applies here. Thus, both conditions are met.
APPS · Q1 2024 → YESThe question is: Does management describe that customers are currently SWITCHING TO THE COMPANY FROM AN ENTRENCHED ALTERNATIVE THEY PREVIOUSLY RELIED ON, and that this switching is still in its early ...YES The transcript shows management describing customers shifting from Apple/Google app stores to DT Hub and SingleTap-enabled alternative distribution as an ongoing, early-stage substitution. Bill Stone notes the company has already launched DT Hub with four U.S. operators and is generating revenue today, while highlighting "increasing pressure on the duopoly" and 5 monetization ways for SingleTap that enable publishers to direct-download apps outside traditional stores. He explicitly calls it "very early days and not yet material to our overall results" and "early innings," confirming the installed base of the old way remains large and the switch is just beginning with incremental RPD gains from devices engaging the new platform. This meets the criteria of a present-tense substitution underway, with the company positioned as the alternative being adopted.

More from the question bank

Personal bests piling upSomebody else pays firstReady-to-run scale already paid for and now Earned edge, pressed harderStrong facts, held-back storyInformed outsiders doubling downAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.