Reality beat their plan and they're leaning in

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management recount that something REAL in the recent period turned out BETTER THAN THE COMPANY ITSELF HAD EXPECTED OR PLANNED — and is the company ALREADY responding to that favorable surprise in some visible way, with the cause of the surprise described as still in effect rather than finished? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent story with all three parts present: (1) A REALIZED FAVORABLE SURPRISE, IN MANAGEMENT'S OWN TELLING. Management indicates — explicitly or plainly in substance — that actual recent events in the business exceeded the company's own prior expectation, plan, assumption, or timeline. The comparison must be against what the COMPANY itself anticipated (phrases like "ahead of our expectations," "faster than we planned," "stronger than we assumed," "sooner than we thought," "we did not expect this level," or an unmistakable equivalent in substance), and the surprise must concern REAL operating events that already happened — such as demand, orders, adoption, sign-ups, volumes, utilization, customer behavior, a ramp or launch progressing, a recovery taking hold, a new offering being taken up, costs or timelines coming in better — in whatever form fits the industry. Any genuine operational form counts; one clear surprise is sufficient. (2) A RESPONSE ALREADY VISIBLE. Because of what surprised them, management describes the company already doing something about it — leaning in rather than merely noting it. The response may take any real form that fits the business: adding capacity, supply, inventory, or people; accelerating or broadening a rollout, launch, or investment; moving up timelines; extending the winning thing to more customers, sites, products, or regions; reallocating resources or attention toward it; or resetting internal plans upward and acting on them. The response must be described as underway, decided and executing, or already done — not merely under consideration. (3) THE CAUSE IS STILL RUNNING. Management conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that whatever produced the upside is still in effect — the demand, adoption, ramp, or improvement is continuing, still building, or still early — rather than a completed episode, so that the reported results reflect only part of what the surprise implies. Answer NO if the only "better than expected" language refers to reported financial results versus published guidance, consensus, or analyst estimates, with no underlying operating events described as beating the company's own plan. NO if the favorable surprise is only forecast or hoped for rather than already experienced. NO if management reports strength but never indicates it exceeded the company's own prior expectations. NO if no response is described, or the response is only being considered or promised for later. NO if management attributes the surprise chiefly to a one-time event, windfall, catch-up, pull-forward, easy comparison, or temporary condition it expects to reverse. NO if the surprise concerns only cost cutting on a flat or shrinking business. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.