Repeat pull from proven relationships plus room left: the installed base is expanding on its own initiative and is still
The model's full reasoning — Q3 2017 call → NOWe need to analyze the transcript for two key elements: (1) existing counterparties (customers, accounts, partners, members, programs) are currently, on their own initiative, taking or committing to meaningfully more from the company than before (e.g., larger reorders, broader deployments, added scope), and (2) management conveys that these relationships remain lightly penetrated, with substantial room still available. The expansion must be present-tense, driven by counterparties' own choice after direct experience, not just price increases or contractual renewals. Also, it must be more than a single account or one-time bulge. Let's scan the transcript for any such descriptions. The call discusses strong retail growth, market share gains, new product launches, etc. But does management talk about existing customers expanding their orders or deployments? There is mention of dealer inventory, RFM (retail flow management), and dealer relationships. However, the focus is on retail sales, market share, and product launches. There is no specific mention of existing customers or partners taking more on their own initiative. The growth is attributed to market share gains, new products, and promotional activities. There is no narrative about existing accounts deepening their engagement. The only possible mention is about dealers, but that is about inventory management, not about dealers voluntarily taking more product. Also, there is no mention of lightly penetrated relationships with room to grow. The company talks about future growth but not in the context of existing relationships expanding. Therefore, the answer is NO. We must answer only YES or NO.
| Ticker | Company | Call | Date | Call grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPC | Pilgrim's Pride Corporation | Q1 2024 | 2024-05-03 | A |
| DUOT | Duos Technologies Group, Inc. | Q4 2023 | 2024-04-01 | F |
| GIII | G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. | Q4 2024 | 2024-03-14 | C |
| KOPN | Kopin Corporation | Q4 2023 | 2024-03-14 | C+ |
| DASH | DoorDash, Inc. | Q3 2023 | 2023-11-01 | C+ |
| SPT | Sprout Social, Inc. | Q2 2023 | 2023-08-04 | B+ |
| AFL | Aflac Incorporated | Q2 2023 | 2023-08-02 | C+ |
| CARS | Cars.com Inc. | Q1 2023 | 2023-05-06 | B |
| CALX | Calix, Inc. | Q1 2023 | 2023-04-20 | C+ |
| TOST | Toast, Inc. | Q4 2022 | 2023-02-16 | C+ |
| ADPT | Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation | Q4 2022 | 2023-02-14 | C+ |
| PI | Impinj, Inc. | Q4 2022 | 2023-02-08 | B+ |
| DM | Desktop Metal, Inc. | Q2 2022 | 2022-08-08 | F |
| FLYW | Flywire Corporation | Q1 2022 | 2022-05-14 | B+ |
| ZVIA | Zevia PBC | Q1 2022 | 2022-05-12 | B |
| FARM | Farmer Bros. Co. | Q3 2022 | 2022-05-07 | D |
| FAT | FAT Brands Inc. | Q4 2021 | 2022-03-21 | F |
| SOPH | SOPHiA GENETICS SA | Q4 2021 | 2022-03-15 | C |
| CYBR | CyberArk Software Ltd. | Q3 2021 | 2021-11-04 | B+ |
| ASAN | Asana, Inc. | Q2 2022 | 2021-09-01 | B+ |
| TENB | Tenable Holdings, Inc. | Q2 2021 | 2021-07-27 | A |
| DGX | Quest Diagnostics Incorporated | Q2 2021 | 2021-07-22 | B+ |
| ADSK | Autodesk, Inc. | Q3 2019 | 2018-11-20 | A |
| YUM | Yum! Brands, Inc. | Q2 2018 | 2018-08-02 | C |
| ORAN | Orange SA | Q2 2018 | 2018-07-26 | B |
| MKC | McCormick & Company, Incorporated | Q2 2018 | 2018-06-28 | C+ |
| CVS | CVS Health Corporation | Q1 2018 | 2018-05-02 | B+ |
| BCOV | Brightcove Inc. | Q1 2018 | 2018-04-26 | B+ |
| ILMN | Illumina, Inc. | Q1 2018 | 2018-04-24 | A |
| ATI | Allegheny Technologies Incorporated | Q1 2018 | 2018-04-24 | B |
| UPLD | Upland Software, Inc. | Q4 2017 | 2018-03-08 | C+ |
| HOLX | Hologic, Inc. | Q4 2017 | 2017-11-08 | D |
| CCOI | Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. | Q2 2017 | 2017-08-03 | B |
| PTC | PTC Inc. | Q3 2017 | 2017-07-19 | C+ |
| WYY | WidePoint Corporation | Q3 2016 | 2016-11-09 | D |
| GOGO | Gogo Inc. | Q1 2016 | 2016-05-06 | C+ |
| WK | Workiva Inc. | Q4 2015 | 2016-03-01 | B |
ZVIA · Q1 2022 → YESThe question is about whether management describes existing customers taking more from the company on their own initiative, and that these relationships are still lightly penetrated. YES Management describes existing customers (households and Club channel buyers) already taking meaningfully more through velocity (51% of growth), higher buy rates (+9%), and heavier consumption in the food channel, while conveying that these relationships remain lightly penetrated with substantial room ahead (new households, expanded flavors, broader deployments). This is 100% present-tense, driven by counterparties’ own choice after direct experience, not price hikes or auto-renewal, and the expansion is already occurring across multiple accounts rather than isolated or projected.
PI · Q4 2022 → YESThe question is about whether management describes existing customers expanding their business with the company, and that these relationships are still lightly penetrated. YES The transcript shows management describing existing customers expanding through program expansions, broader deployments, and continued system deployments that are already occurring and expected to drive large volumes in 2023 and beyond, while conveying that these relationships remain lightly penetrated with substantial room for further growth in scope, sites, and usage.
CVS · Q1 2018 → YESThe question is about whether management describes existing customers taking more from the company on their own initiative, and that these relationships are still lightly penetrated. YES The transcript shows management describing existing partnerships (Optum and Cigna clients) already taking more programs through an uptick in CVS Pharmacy and MinuteClinic offerings, driven by the companies' own adoption after experience, with continued opportunities for 2020 and beyond indicating substantial room remains in those relationships.