Running hot in customers' hands

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the company's product, service, capacity, or offering — as ALREADY deployed, installed, adopted, or in use with its EXISTING customers — is being USED, CONSUMED, RUN, OR DRAWN ON MORE INTENSIVELY than those relationships were originally sized, scoped, or expected to require, with this heavier usage described as actually observable in the current business? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the industry, ONE coherent phenomenon: the intensity of real-world usage inside relationships the company has already won is climbing on its own, ahead of what the company or the customer originally planned for. Any genuine expression of this counts — for example: customers consuming, processing, transacting, or ordering through the company's product or platform at rates above what their arrangement anticipated; installed equipment, systems, or capacity being run harder, longer, or at higher utilization than customers initially operated it; usage, volumes, or activity per existing account growing noticeably faster than the count of accounts; customers exhausting, outgrowing, or burning through what they bought sooner than expected and coming back earlier or bigger as a result; consumption-based or usage-based activity from the existing base running ahead of the levels those customers committed to; or management observing that the base it already serves keeps needing more of the product per customer than it used to. What matters is that the pressure originates in OBSERVED USAGE BEHAVIOR of customers the company already has — the existing base is running hot — and that management presents this as a current, real pattern in the business (grounded in what accounts are actually doing now) with the resulting additional business still mostly ahead rather than fully reflected in the reported results. Answer NO if growth is described mainly as winning new customers, new markets, or new logos rather than heavier use within existing relationships. NO if management describes only ordinary same-customer growth, routine reorders at the usual pace, or price increases on unchanged usage. NO if the heavier usage is only hoped for, projected, or expected from a future rollout rather than already being observed. NO if the intensity is attributed chiefly to a one-time spike, seasonal peak, stockpiling, pull-forward, or temporary condition management expects to unwind. NO if usage or utilization is described as flat, declining, or normalizing downward. NO if the only evidence is a single account anecdote with no sense of a broader pattern. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.