Second wind after a long dry spell

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that something the company has been WORKING ON, HOLDING, OR CARRYING FOR A LONG TIME WITHOUT MUCH TO SHOW FOR IT has, in the recent period, FINALLY STARTED TO PRODUCE — and does management's own account of the business make clear that this is the payoff arriving on something old, not a brand-new initiative just getting started? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent phenomenon: a long-standing asset, effort, investment, relationship, capability, franchise, or position — one that management describes (directly or plainly in substance) as having been in place, in development, dormant, disappointing, out of favor, or slow to pay for an extended stretch of time — is now, in the current period, visibly generating real output: orders, customers, revenue, cash, activity, adoption, approvals, utilization, wins, or other concrete results that management points to as ALREADY HAPPENING. The essence is the contrast between a long, unrewarded gestation and a present-tense turn to production. Any genuine expression of this counts, and the form may vary widely across industries — for example: a program, platform, facility, mine, field, fleet, property, technology, or product line that took years and is now finally contributing; a long-cultivated customer, channel, partner, or market that has at last begun ordering at scale; an installed base, portfolio, library, license, patent estate, land position, or data asset the company has held quietly that is now being drawn on; a capability the company spent years building internally that is only now showing up in what customers buy; or a business the company kept funding through a long stretch of little or no return that has just started to deliver. Management should present the turn as real and observable NOW — grounded in what the business actually produced or booked recently — while also conveying, in their own framing, that the underlying thing behind it has been in place or in the works far longer than the results. Answer NO if the results being described come from something newly launched, newly acquired, or newly begun, where there was no long unrewarded period beforehand. NO if management describes a long-running effort that is still not producing, is still awaiting a future catalyst, or is only expected to contribute later. NO if the company has been performing consistently well and there is no stretch of dormancy, disappointment, or delay to contrast against. NO if the improvement is simply a cyclical rebound in prices, volumes, or macro conditions with nothing specific to something the company has long carried or built. NO if the only "finally paying off" language is generic ("our investments are bearing fruit") without any sense of what long-held thing is now producing or what it is actually producing. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.