Serial adoption cadence

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that ONE IDENTIFIABLE OFFERING of the company — a specific product, service, platform, program, or solution — is currently being adopted by a SUCCESSION OF NEW CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES, win after win, with the pace of new adoptions holding up or quickening, such that the story of the quarter is the accumulating string of new adopters rather than any single deal? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent pattern as a present-tense reality: the same offering keeps landing — management recounts multiple recent, distinct new adopters (new accounts, customers, clients, partners, sites, systems, chains, operators, agencies, or programs) gained in the recent period or in quick succession across recent periods; treats these wins as a continuing series rather than a finished event (more just signed, more in late stages, wins continuing after the quarter closed, each period adding to the count); and frames this repeating adoption of that offering as the central driver of where the company is heading — the ramp is in motion and still building, with the results so far only beginning to reflect it. The adopters, the offering, and the way the cadence is described may take whatever form fits the industry. Answer NO if management describes strong overall demand, growth, or a good quarter without pointing to a repeating series of distinct new adopters of an identifiable offering. NO if only one new customer, deal, or win is described, however large. NO if the new-adopter discussion is routine customer-count reporting for a business that always adds many customers, with no sense that this cadence is notable, building, or central to the company's trajectory. NO if the string of wins is only hoped for, projected, or described as a pipeline of prospects not yet committed. NO if the succession of adoptions is described as having stalled, slowed, or concluded. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.