Still getting better as they speak

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the business's positive momentum HAS CONTINUED OR STRENGTHENED BEYOND THE PERIOD BEING REPORTED — that the improvement did not stop when the quarter closed, but is still running at the time management is speaking — AND does management tie that continuing strength to at least one NAMED, ALREADY-LIVE driver of the business rather than to hopes about conditions? Answer YES when management's own words convey BOTH halves of this one phenomenon, in whatever form fits the business: (1) STRENGTH THAT EXTENDS PAST THE REPORTED PERIOD. Management describes real business activity — such as orders, sales, bookings, customers, volumes, traffic, utilization, output, or wins — as having remained strong or gotten stronger in the latter part of the reported period AND/OR in the weeks since it ended, so that the pace at which the business is running NOW is at or above the level the reported results show. Any genuine expression of this counts, for example: momentum described as continuing or accelerating into the current quarter; activity since period-end described as strong, building, or ahead of the reported pace; trends that strengthened as the period progressed and are described as still in place; or management stating that what drove the quarter is still happening as they speak. The continuation must be presented as something already observed in actual business activity — not merely as guidance, a forecast, or general confidence about the year. (2) A NAMED, LIVE DRIVER BEHIND IT. When management explains why the strength is continuing, it points to at least one specific, identifiable driver that already exists and is already producing — such as a particular product, service, offering, customer or customer group, contract or program, market, channel, capability, or capacity that is currently generating the activity — rather than resting the continuation on hoped-for market recovery, seasonality, macro improvement, or generic optimism. The driver may take whatever form fits the industry; what matters is that management can say, in concrete terms, what is producing the ongoing strength and that it is in motion now. Answer NO if the reported period is weak, mixed, or merely stabilizing, so there is no strength to continue. NO if management describes the strong period but says nothing about activity continuing at or above that pace beyond it — a good quarter with only routine guidance is not this phenomenon. NO if the continuation is expressed only through forecasts, targets, pipeline, or hoped-for conditions rather than through observed activity. NO if management itself attributes the strength mainly to a one-time event, catch-up, pull-forward, easy comparison, or temporary condition it expects to fade, or describes momentum as slowing or normalizing. NO if the continuing strength is asserted only in generic terms ("momentum remains strong") with no identifiable live driver behind it anywhere on the call. NO if the continuation appears only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.