The streak is alive

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management present the just-reported period as THE LATEST STEP IN AN UNBROKEN, STILL-RUNNING SEQUENCE OF QUARTER-AFTER-QUARTER IMPROVEMENT IN THE SAME PART OF THE BUSINESS — explicitly connecting this period to the immediately preceding period or periods as one continuing climb — with real, current-period evidence that the sequence extended again? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent pattern with all three of the following present: (1) A NAMED IMPROVEMENT THAT HAS NOW REPEATED ACROSS CONSECUTIVE PERIODS. Management identifies something specific about the business — such as orders, customers, volumes, output, utilization, activity, bookings, profitability, or the performance of a particular product, operation, or market — and describes it as having improved again this period on top of improvement in the immediately prior period or a run of recent consecutive periods. The chaining must be management's own sequential framing — for example, 'another quarter of growth,' 'our fourth consecutive quarter of...', 'improved again from last quarter,' 'each quarter this year has been stronger than the one before,' or equivalent language linking this period to the one(s) just before it. Comparisons made only against the year-ago period, or general claims of momentum without sequential linkage, do not qualify. (2) THE LATEST STEP IS REAL AND CURRENT. The extension of the streak in the just-reported period is grounded in things that actually happened — actual orders, sales, customers, volumes, shipments, activity, or results in this period described as above the prior period's level — not in forecasts, pipeline, or expectations of continued improvement. (3) MANAGEMENT TREATS THE SEQUENCE AS STILL RUNNING, DRIVEN BY SOMETHING OF THE COMPANY'S OWN. Management attributes the repeating improvement mainly to drivers attached to the company itself — its offering, customers, capabilities, capacity, or changes it made — that remain in force now, and conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that the sequence is continuing rather than concluded: the same drivers are still working, further steps are already forming, or the exit pace is at or above the period's level. Answer NO if the improvement is described only against the year-ago quarter or an easy comparison, with no explicit quarter-to-quarter chaining by management. NO if the period is presented as a single strong quarter, a rebound, or an inflection without a preceding consecutive run. NO if the streak is attributed mainly to external conditions — commodity prices, industry-wide shortage, restocking, pull-forward, seasonality, weather, or macro tailwinds — or to one-time events. NO if management itself signals the run is peaking, normalizing, or expected to pause. NO if the sequential improvement is only in cost cutting or shrinking losses on a declining business. NO if the streak framing appears only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.