Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

Customers Bancorp, Inc. (CUBI) — this company's answers

NO on the Q3 2018 call 2018-10-26 C+
The model's full reasoning — Q3 2018 call → NO我们根据指令,只使用提供的电话会议记录。问题问的是:在近期,公司是否从两个方向同时加强业务:(1)新的付费对手方实际到来(新客户、账户、合作伙伴或项目实际签署、订购或开始交易,作为真实事件而非管道);(2)现有对手方扩大了他们的采购(现有账户或关系在近期内明显增加了订单、范围、数量、站点、使用量或承诺,是出于对手方自己的选择,而不仅仅是价格上涨)——管理层是否将这种双向构建描述为已经观察到的、当前模式,并且对公司未来发展很重要? 我们需要检查记录中是否有管理层明确提到这两个方面作为已经发生的事实,而不是计划或预测。 首先,寻找新的对手方实际到来的证据。管理层提到了几个方面: - 推出CB digital bank,这是一个面向高收入高净值个人的直接银行,正在以每月约5200万到1亿美元的速度产生核心存款增长。(这是新账户/新客户,实际发生) - BankMobile存款持续增加。(现有业务增长) - 启动消费者贷款产品,主要与Upstart合作,显示出适度增长。(新合作伙伴/新客户) 其次,现有对手方扩大采购的证据: - 存款增长:需求存款季度环比增长38%,货币市场和储蓄增长19%,定期存款增长25%。(现有存款客户增加余额?但可能是新客户?不过存款增长可能来自新客户或现有客户增加存款,但管理层没有明确说是现有客户扩大。) - 托管余额显著增加。(可能与现有抵押贷款客户有关?但这是季节性?) - 白标合作伙伴关系:预计明年推出,但这是未来计划,不是近期事件。 关键是要看管理层是否将“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”同时描述为近期已经观察到的模式。我们需要在文本中寻找明确的表述。 在开头部分,Jay Sidhu说:“从存款角度来看,作为战略一部分的核心存款增长在2018年Q3急剧加速。”他提到三个原因:1)年内计划中的存款生成和产品能力改进在Q3实施,导致托管余额显著增加;2)推出CB digital bank,正在产生每月约5200万到1亿美元的存款增长;3)BankMobile存款继续增加。这些是近期实际发生的事件。 对于现有客户扩大:托管余额增加可能是现有抵押贷款客户的选择(因为他们需要托管账户),但这是否是“现有对手方扩大”?托管余额通常与抵押贷款服务相关,可能随着贷款量增加而增加,但贷款量在下降(多户贷款下降)。托管余额增加可能来自新贷款或服务活动,但不一定明确。 再仔细看:他们提到“escrow balances increased significantly”作为存款增长的原因之一。这可能是现有客户关系的一部分,但表述不明确。 另外,消费者贷款刚刚启动,显示出适度增长,这是新业务。 但问题是:管理层是否明确将“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”作为两个方向同时发生?我们需要找到明确的陈述。 在战略优先事项部分,Jay说:“我们期望从核心特许经营中增长低成本的存款,仅明年就预计增加约6亿美元。此外,我们期望CB digital direct bank增加约5亿到6亿美元...第三,我们期望在推出白标合作伙伴后,每年约5亿美元增长通过BankMobile。”这些是未来计划。 关于近期,Jay提到:“我们不断经历着——在上次美联储加息后我们没有提高任何利率,但我们仍然看到每月约5000万到6000万美元的核心存款流入。”这可能是现有存款客户继续存入,也可能是新客户。 再检查整个记录,有没有明确说“现有客户增加了购买”?似乎没有直接说现有客户扩大订单或使用量。存款增长可能来自新客户,也可能来自现有客户增加余额,但管理层没有明确区分。 另外,贷款方面:C&I贷款同比增长15%,但这是现有贷款组合的增长率,可能包括新贷款,但多户贷款下降。没有明确说现有客户扩大贷款额度。 所以,在近期,管理层提到了新客户的到来(CB digital bank、Upstart合作、BankMobile新客户),但关于现有对手方扩大,没有明确表述。 因此,可能只有一边(新客户)而没有另一边(现有客户扩大)。所以答案应为NO。 但再仔细看,托管余额增加可能被视为现有客户(抵押贷款借款人)增加他们的托管存款?但托管余额通常与贷款服务相关,可能是贷款活动增加,但多户贷款在下降。所以不太明确。 另外,BankMobile存款继续增加,这可能包括现有学生客户增加存款?但BankMobile是新客户获取和现有客户使用并存。 但关键问题:管理层是否说“现有客户选择扩大”?我没有看到明确陈述。 因此,答案应该是NO。 最终回答:NO。

← Back to the full CUBI analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.