Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

Nordson Corporation (NDSN) — this company's answers

NO on the Q3 2016 call 2016-08-23 A
The model's full reasoning — Q3 2016 call → NO我们根据提供的财报电话会议记录来判断。问题问的是:管理层是否描述了近期业务从两个方向同时加强:(1)新的付费对手方实际到来(新客户、账户、合作伙伴或项目实际签约、订购或开始交易),以及(2)现有对手方扩大了他们的采购(现有账户或关系明显增加了订单、范围、数量、站点、使用或承诺),并且管理层将这种双向增长视为观察到的、当前的模式,对公司未来有意义。 我们需要在记录中寻找证据。记录中提到了订单率、积压订单、各细分市场的增长等。例如,在先进技术领域,订单率上升29%,由移动电子终端市场驱动,需求强劲。在工业涂料领域,订单率上升36%,所有产品线均实现两位数增长。在粘合剂点胶领域,订单率上升2%,但比较基数较高。管理层提到“新客户”或“现有客户扩大”了吗?记录中提到了“新应用”、“新产品”、“新客户”等。例如,Mike Hilton说:“我们正在通过创新产品、分层新应用、新兴市场渗透和现有安装基础的资本重组来捕捉增长机会。”这暗示了新的应用和客户。但具体到“新付费对手方实际到来”和“现有对手方扩大”这两个方面,记录中是否有明确描述? 在先进技术部分,提到“强劲需求来自移动电子终端市场,对我们的自动和半自动点胶系统、测试和检测设备以及表面处理系统的需求强劲。”这可能是现有客户扩大订单,也可能是新客户。但管理层没有明确区分新客户和现有客户。在工业涂料部分,提到“订单在所有产品线均实现两位数增长,由汽车和耐用消费品终端市场需求驱动。”同样没有明确区分。 在粘合剂点胶部分,提到“一般产品组装和刚性包装产品线需求强劲。”也没有明确区分。 管理层在总结中说:“我们正在从终端市场的多样性中受益,并通过创新产品、分层新应用、新兴市场渗透和现有安装基础的资本重组来捕捉增长机会。”这提到了“新应用”和“新兴市场渗透”,可能意味着新客户,但“现有安装基础的资本重组”可能意味着现有客户升级。但这是否是“实际到来”和“扩大”的具体事件?记录中提到了订单率上升,但订单率上升可能来自新客户和现有客户,但管理层没有明确说“新客户签约”或“现有客户增加订单”。他们提到了“订单率”和“积压订单”,但这是总体数据。 问题要求的是“新付费对手方实际到来”和“现有对手方扩大”这两个方面都作为已发生的事实。记录中是否有具体例子?例如,在先进技术部分,提到“我们推出了一些新技术,允许更小的点,这扩大了应用范围,我们看到了这些新产品的牵引力。”这可能是新应用,但未明确是新客户。在医疗领域,提到“流体管理组件需求强劲。”同样未明确。 在粘合剂部分,提到“Freedom和Liberty产品线”可能吸引新客户,但未明确。 管理层在回答问题时提到“我们正在看到一些新应用,例如防水应用,推动机会。”这可能是新应用,但未明确是新客户。 总体来看,记录中提到了订单增长、积压增长,但管理层没有明确描述“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”这两个具体方面。他们提到了“新应用”、“新产品”,但未明确说“新客户签约”或“现有客户增加订单”。此外,问题要求“管理层自己的话”传达这两个方面。记录中是否有这样的表述?在Mike Hilton的总结中,他说:“我们正在通过创新产品、分层新应用、新兴市场渗透和现有安装基础的资本重组来捕捉增长机会。”这可以解释为既有新客户(新兴市场渗透)又有现有客户(现有安装基础资本重组),但这是概括性的,不是具体事件。而且“资本重组”可能意味着现有客户升级,但未明确是“扩大订单”。 在回答分析师问题时,Mike Hilton提到“我们看到了新产品的牵引力”和“我们正在看到一些新应用”,但未明确新客户。 因此,可能只有一侧(现有客户扩大)或只有一侧(新客户)?实际上,记录中提到了“订单率上升”,但未区分。管理层没有明确说“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”同时发生。他们提到了“新应用”和“现有安装基础”,但未明确是实际事件。 此外,问题要求“管理层呈现这种双向增长作为观察到的、当前的模式”。记录中是否有这样的表述?在总结中,Mike Hilton说:“我们正在从终端市场的多样性中受益,并通过创新产品、分层新应用、新兴市场渗透和现有安装基础的资本重组来捕捉增长机会。”这可以视为双向,但未明确是“实际到来”和“扩大”的具体事件。 在回答关于先进技术的问题时,Mike Hilton提到“我们看到了新产品的牵引力”和“我们正在看到一些新应用”,但未明确新客户。 因此,我认为记录中没有明确描述“新付费对手方实际到来”和“现有对手方扩大”这两个方面作为已发生的事实。管理层提到了订单增长,但未区分来源。所以答案应为NO。 但让我们再仔细检查。在订单率部分,Greg说:“在先进技术领域,订单率上升29%,由移动电子终端市场驱动,需求强劲。”这可能是现有客户扩大,但未明确新客户。在工业涂料,订单率上升36%,所有产品线均增长。同样未明确。 在粘合剂,订单率上升2%,但比较基数高。 管理层在回答问题时提到“我们正在看到一些新应用,例如防水应用”,但未明确是新客户。 因此,我认为没有明确的两侧描述。所以答案应为NO。

← Back to the full NDSN analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.