Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

News Corporation (NWSA) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2016 call 2016-08-08 C+
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2016 call → NO我们根据要求,需要判断管理层是否同时描述了:1) 新付费客户/账户/合作伙伴/项目实际签约或开始交易;2) 现有客户/关系扩大订单、范围、数量、站点、使用或承诺。两者都必须是近期已经发生的事实,而不是管道或计划。 从转录中,我们寻找相关描述。 关于新客户/账户/合作伙伴:提到了许多数字订阅增长、新用户、合作伙伴等。例如,Realtor.com的流量增长,但那是用户,不是付费客户。数字订阅增长,如WSJ的948,000数字订阅者,但那是现有数字订阅者的增长?实际上,订阅者是新签约的。但需要区分。 具体看,管理层提到“new releases”在书籍,但那是产品。在数字房地产,提到“record audiences”和“ever-more advertising”,但广告可能是现有广告商。关于“connection for co-broke”产品增长,那是来自现有业务?另外,提到“custom content”在Dow Jones,但未明确新客户。 在新闻部分,提到“digital subscriptions”增长,但那是现有订阅者续费还是新订阅?通常增长表明新订阅者。 但关键是,管理层是否明确描述了新的付费客户到来?例如,在Wireless Group收购,那是收购,不是新客户。 检查具体表述:在“Digital Real Estate”部分,提到“REA's revenue grew 17%... due to higher list depth product penetration” - 那是现有客户增加使用?还有“Move revenues rose 21%... driven by strong growth in the Connection for Co-Broke product” - 这个产品似乎是现有代理商的参与。 关于“Checkout 51”提到“goal of reaching 10 million users” - 那是未来目标。 在“Foxtel”部分,提到“subscriber volume”增长,但那是现有订阅?还是新订阅?实际上是净增。 但我们需要看是否有明确的“新客户”和“现有客户扩大”同时发生。 似乎管理层主要强调数字订阅增长(新订阅者),以及现有客户(如REA的列表深度)增加。但不够具体。 仔细阅读:在“Dow Jones”部分,提到“circulation revenues at The Wall Street Journal grew 5%... due to higher subscription pricing and higher digital paid subscribers” - 那是价格和数量。价格是涨价,数量是新订阅?但涨价是价格,不是扩大订单。另外,数字订阅者增加,可能是新订阅者。 在“News UK”部分,提到“The Times saw high-single-digits paid volume growth” - 那是付费订阅量增长,可能是新订阅。 但需要同时有现有客户扩大订单。例如,在“Digital Real Estate”中,REA的“list depth product penetration”可能指现有客户购买更多产品。Move的“Connection for Co-Broke”也是现有代理商的参与度提高。 此外,在“News America Marketing”中,提到“in-store revenues grew mid-teens” - 那是现有客户在店内广告支出增加?还是新客户?不明确。 重要的是,管理层是否明确将这两方面作为“observed, current pattern”来呈现?似乎没有明确说“新客户到来”和“现有客户扩大”同时发生。 相反,许多增长是价格推动的(如订阅价格提高)或整体市场趋势。 在回答中,需要严格判断。我认为缺乏明确的“新付费客户签约”的描述。例如,在“HarperCollins”中,新书发布是产品,不是客户。 此外,关于“Wireless Group”是收购,不是客户。 因此,可能只看到现有客户扩大(如REA的深度)或数字订阅增长(可能包含新订阅),但没有明确的新账户或合作伙伴实际开始交易。 回顾:在“Digital Real Estate”中,提到“REA and Realtor.com”有“record audiences”,但那是用户,不是付费客户。广告商可能增加,但未明确。 具体来说,在“News Australia”中,提到“cost reduction”和“growth in digital subscribers” - 但数字订阅可能是新订阅。 我认为,没有明确的两方面同时出现。管理层主要谈论收入增长,但未区分新客户和现有客户扩张。 因此,答案应为NO。 注意问题要求“management presents this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading?” - 需要明确。 从转录中,我没有看到这样的描述。所以NO。

← Back to the full NWSA analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.