Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2021 call 2021-08-10 B+
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2021 call → NO我们根据提供的财报电话会议记录来判断。问题询问的是:在近期期间,公司业务是否从两个方向同时加强:(1)新的付费交易对手实际到达(真实事件),(2)现有交易对手扩大了他们的规模,并且管理层将这种双向构建视为已观察到的当前模式。 在记录中,管理层描述了直接贷款业务的创纪录部署(5.1亿美元),以及技术贷款策略的增长,还有GP解决方案业务的投资活动。具体来说,Marc Lipschultz提到:“我们继续看到本季度的活动水平至少与上季度一致”,并且提到了强劲的管道。但关于“新客户”的明确描述,如新的赞助商关系,以及现有关系的增长,是否有具体提到? 在记录中,Doug提到零售业务每月超过1亿美元,但这是现有渠道。关于新客户,Marc提到“我们拥有超过500个赞助商关系,预计这个数字和深度会大幅增加”,但这是预期,不是已发生。然而,他也说“我们看到了非常强劲的管道”,但管道不是已发生的事实。 关于现有客户扩大规模,例如Dyal Fund V已经承诺了约30%的预期资本,这是事实。但这是新基金,不是现有客户扩大。在直接贷款中,现有关系可能带来更多交易,但记录中没有明确说“现有客户增加了订单”。 我们需要找到管理层明确描述近期已经发生的两个方向。在Alan的发言中:“直接贷款第二季度创纪录的毛部署为51亿美元,净出资部署为32亿美元。”这反映了部署活动,但这是新交易还是现有?可能两者都有。但关键是要有“新交易对手”和“现有交易对手扩大”的具体描述。 再仔细阅读:Marc说:“我们继续看到活动水平持续强劲,并且我们正在扩大赞助商关系。”但这是计划。Michael说:“我们已经在Dyal Fund V上承诺了约30%的资本,通过四项投资,我们只在上个月举行了首次收盘。”这是新投资,是新的GP合作伙伴,属于新客户。 对于现有客户扩大,Marc提到:“随着赞助商筹集更大的基金并扩大产品,我们期望与他们一起成长。”但这是预期。 也许问题中的“recent period”指的是第二季度。在第二季度,发生了什么?直接贷款部署创纪录,但这是否包括新客户?记录中没有明确说新客户数量增加。但有一些线索:例如,技术贷款策略是新的,但那是已有策略。 另一个角度:GP解决方案方面,Dyal Fund V的投资是新的交易对手,这是“新付款对手方到达”。同时,现有关系是否扩大?例如,Dyal的合作伙伴可能增加对资本的获取,但没有明确说明。 管理层是否将两者结合描述为当前模式?在Doug的开场中,他提到“我们看到了两个业务之间显著的协同机会”,但没有具体说明近期发生的双方面增长。 我们需要回答YES或NO。根据记录,可能只有一方明显:新的投资活动(新交易对手)是明确的,但现有交易对手扩大规模似乎没有明确以同样方式描述。在直接贷款中,现有借款人可能增加借款,但没有明确说“现有关系扩大规模”。 实际上,在记录中,Marc提到“我们能够提供灵活和定制的解决方案,并且我们与赞助商的关系继续增长”,但这是总体陈述。在回答问题时,管理层没有明确说“近期我们看到新客户到来,同时现有客户也增加了订单”。 问题要求“management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts”。让我们查找具体语句。 在Marc的发言中:“我们继续看到本季度的活动水平至少与上季度一致,并且我们在第二季度创纪录地部署了51亿美元。”(但这是部署,不是新客户。) 在Doug的发言中,关于零售:“我们的销售额已超过每月1亿美元,但大部分在独立经纪商渠道。”这是现有渠道。 关于新客户,Michael提到“我们已经通过四次投资承诺了约30%的资金”,这是新投资。 那么现有客户是否扩大?也许在直接贷款中,现有关系可能带来更多贷款,但没有明确说“现有客户在增加规模”。 考虑到问题强调“recent period”和“real events”,也许“新付款对手方”指的是Dyal Fund V的新投资,而“现有交易对手”则指现有LP增加配置?但记录中没有明确。 或许管理层将增长归因于“市场机会”和“管道”,但管道不是已发生。 我认为只有一方是明确的:新投资(新GP合作伙伴)是实际发生的,而现有关系的扩大更多是预期。所以答案应为NO。 但让我们再确认:在Alan的发言中,他提到“我们的AUM增长了8%,主要由资本筹集和部署驱动”,但这是整体。 在问答环节,当被问及直接贷款部署时,管理层提到了持续强劲的活动,但未明确区分新老客户。 因此,根据严格标准,答案为NO。

← Back to the full OWL analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.