Question Bank › Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity

Two-sided intensity: both new counterparties arriving and existing ones enlarging in the same recent period

Calls Tested
496
Answered YES
88
Hit Rate
17.7%
rare by design

Valvoline Inc. (VVV) — this company's answers

NO on the Q1 2022 call 2022-02-09 C+
The model's full reasoning — Q1 2022 call → NO我们根据提供的会议记录来回答。问题问的是:在近期,公司是否同时出现了(1)新客户/账户/合作伙伴/项目实际开始交易,以及(2)现有客户/关系主动扩大其订单/范围/数量等,并且管理层将这种双方面增长描述为已经发生的事实。 检查会议记录: - 零售服务:同店销售增长近25%,由交易量驱动,也提到新增门店(单位增长)。但"新支付对手方"是否具体?提到"新店开业"是新增门店,但那是公司自己开的,不是外部新客户。但同店销售增长说明现有客户或新客户在现有门店消费。但需要具体的新客户签约或新账户加入?管理层提到"数据分析和客户获取",但那是策略。没有明确说"新客户实际开始交易"。 - 全球产品:销售量增长,但主要是通过定价传递。提到"我们继续在多个地区获得份额","我们正在赢得重型设备业务"等,但具体新客户?提到墨西哥分销商网络扩展,但那是渠道。没有具体说新账户签约或现有客户扩大订单。 更仔细看: - 零售服务:同店销售增长近25%,由交易量驱动,意味着更多客户来,但这是整体,没有区分新老客户。但管理层说"我们做得很好,保留这些新客户以及现有客户"——暗示新客户来了。而且提到"增加新门店"也是新增容量。 - 全球产品:销售量增长,但管理层强调"尽管供应链挑战,我们仍然获得份额","我们正在赢得新的货架空间"(美国DIY),"新的分销渠道如农场和便利店","我们最近推出了Extended Protection产品,在市场上成功,导致显著份额增长"。这些表明有新客户(新渠道、新账户)。同时"我们正在扩大与现有客户的关系"?没有明确说现有客户扩大订单,但销售增长部分来自价格,但销售量也增长。 关键:管理层是否明确说"新客户实际到达"和"现有客户扩大"?在零售部分,同店销售增长意味着现有门店的销售额增长,这可能是新客户或现有客户更大消费,但没有明确区分。在讨论交易增长时,说"自2016年以来,系统范围交易几乎翻倍,使增长超过DIFM市场",但那是长期。 在近期(最近一季度),管理层说"我们的零售服务同店销售增长近25%,由交易量驱动"——交易量增加意味着更多客户(新或现有)。但问题要求"新支付对手方实际到达"——即新客户签约或开始交易。管理层提到"客户获取"和"保留"但没具体数字。 全球产品:提到"我们继续获得份额"和"新增分销"——这些是新的渠道或账户。但"现有账户扩大"?没有明确。 问题要求两个方向都必须有。如果只有新客户而没有现有客户扩大,或反之,都不行。这里似乎有"新客户"(新渠道、新分销、新门店),但"现有客户扩大"不明显。同店销售增长可能包含现有客户增加消费,但那是整体交易量,没有明确说现有账户主动扩大。 更直接:管理层是否描述"现有客户(如大型零售商、安装商)增加了订单量"?在讨论价格传递时,提到"我们开始通过定价传递成本增加",但那是价格而非数量。在零售服务,同店销售增长是交易量增长,但交易量可能来自新客户或现有客户,没有区分。 另外,管理层提到"我们正在赢得新的货架空间"(新客户),"我们正在扩大分销"(新渠道),但"现有账户"的规模增长?没有明确。 在零售服务,提到"新增门店"和"收购"是公司扩张,不是客户。客户是来店里的消费者。 也许在讨论EV试点时,提到"我们成为Arrival的服务合作伙伴"——那是新合作伙伴(新客户),但只是一个。 综合来看,管理层描述了"新客户"(新分销、新货架、新合作伙伴),但"现有客户扩大"的表述较弱。在谈论零售服务时,同店销售增长主要由交易驱动,但未说现有客户增加了购买频率或数量,而是整体交易增长。此外,价格增长占一部分。 问题要求"以管理层的原话传达两个半部分都是近期已发生的事实"。可能没有明确。 也许在Global Products,提到"我们在重型设备领域份额翻倍"等,但那可能是整体增长。 再仔细阅读:在Q1结果中,零售服务销售增长36%,同店销售增长近25%,系统门店销售增长31%,由同店和单位增长驱动。单位增长是新增门店。同店增长来自交易量。交易量增加意味着客户群扩大或现有客户更多消费,但管理层没有明确说"新客户签约"。 而全球产品,销售量增长,但管理层说"销售量增长"和"我们正在获得份额",但"获得份额"可能来自新客户或现有客户转换,但未明确。 关键段落:在slide 6上,提到"我们继续积极增加门店单位"和"收购和新店管道强劲"。那是门店增长,不是客户。 在slide 7,提到"数据分析和客户获取"——但那是策略。 在slide 8,全球产品说"销售量增长"和"我们继续获得份额"。但具体"新账户开始交易"没有。 也许在回答问题中,管理层提到"我们最近推出了Extended Protection产品,表现成功,导致显著份额增长"——那是新产品,可能吸引新客户或现有客户。 但整体,没有明确说"现有客户(如大型零售商)增加了订单规模",而只是整体销售增长。 由于要求严格,只有一边明显,另一边不明显,所以答案应为NO。 再确认:问题问的是"new paying counterparties actually arrived"和"existing counterparties enlarged what they take"。管理层在会议中是否明确提到?例如,在零售服务,提到"新门店"不是客户。在Global Products,提到"新的分销渠道"和"赢得货架空间"可能暗示新账户,但"现有账户扩大"没有。 也许在讨论延续时,提到"我们的客户库存非常低,未来有补货需求"——那是预测。 所以,我认为没有同时明确两个方向。因此答案NO。

← Back to the full VVV analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that in the RECENT PERIOD the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once — (1) NEW paying counterparties actually arrived: fresh customers, accounts, partners, or programs that actually signed, ordered, or began transacting in the recent period, described as real events rather than pipeline; AND (2) EXISTING counterparties enlarged what they take: accounts or relationships the company already had that visibly stepped up their orders, scope, volumes, sites, usage, or commitments in the same recent period, by the counterparty's own choice rather than through price increases alone — with management presenting this two-sided build as an observed, current pattern that is meaningful to where the company is heading? Answer YES when management's own words convey both halves as already-occurring facts of the recent period, in whatever form fits the industry, grounded in real activity (actual signings, orders, deployments, volumes, or usage) rather than hopes, and management treats the combination — widening and deepening together — as characterizing the business now, with more of both still forming. Answer NO if only one side is present — new wins without existing relationships growing, or expansion within the base without new arrivals. NO if either side is described only through pipeline, interest, plans, or projections. NO if the pattern rests on a single large deal, seasonal catch-up, restocking, or a condition management expects to fade. NO if the growth described is chiefly price increases pushed onto unchanged volumes. NO if the two-sided framing appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. Q1 2024 2024-04-18 B
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
NICE NICE Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-22 B+
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado Q3 2023 2023-11-10 C+
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
VIPS Vipshop Holdings Limited Q2 2023 2023-08-18 C+
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-04 B+
PERI Perion Network Ltd. Q2 2023 2023-08-02 A
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
PFIE Profire Energy, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-13 B
SPIR Spire Global, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-10 B
CALX Calix, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-04-20 C+
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
DKS DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-07 B
TOST Toast, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-16 C+
ADPT Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-14 C+
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-08 B
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
MEC Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-05 B+
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
KEY KeyCorp Q3 2022 2022-10-20 B+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
IT Gartner, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 A
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
CME CME Group Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B
OGI OrganiGram Holdings Inc. Q3 2022 2022-07-14 B+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
FLYW Flywire Corporation Q1 2022 2022-05-14 B+
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
OPK OPKO Health, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-09 D
BXP Boston Properties, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-03 A
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
SOPH SOPHiA GENETICS SA Q4 2021 2022-03-15 C
RELY Remitly Global, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-02 B
FLUX Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-10 D
GTES Gates Industrial Corporation plc Q4 2021 2022-02-07 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 B+
IRBT iRobot Corporation Q3 2021 2021-10-28 D
ASAN Asana, Inc. Q2 2022 2021-09-01 B+
TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-18 C
UFI Unifi, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-08-07 B
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-27 A
TCBI Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Q2 2021 2021-07-21 F
CMTL Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Q1 2019 2018-12-07 B+
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated Q2 2018 2018-06-28 C+
SATS EchoStar Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-10 C+
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ILMN Illumina, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 A
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-02-16 B
DLHC DLH Holdings Corp. Q1 2018 2018-02-06 C+
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
MITK Mitek Systems, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-07 C+
MKTX MarketAxess Holdings Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+
SBFG SB Financial Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-20 A
GNTX Gentex Corporation Q3 2017 2017-10-20 B
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
FLEX Flex Ltd. Q1 2018 2017-07-28 F
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
IONS Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-09 C
ICFI ICF International, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-06 B+
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation Q1 2017 2017-02-08 A
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp Q4 2016 2017-01-24 B+
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
BCH Banco de Chile Q3 2016 2016-10-30 B+
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
MAT Mattel, Inc. Q3 2016 2016-10-19 C
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
WK Workiva Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-01 B
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-25 C

How the model reasoned

PFIE · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management describes intensification from BOTH new paying counterparties AND existing ones enlarging what they take, in the recent period, as observed facts. YES Management describes both new arrivals ("new customers," "new opportunities," "several project opportunities," "notable customers" including specific ones like Equitrans Midstream and Enterprise Products) and existing-customer expansion ("repeat orders," "repeat business," "repeat orders from one of the United States’ largest producers," " 85,000 burner management solutions," "large uptick... on retrofits") as already-completed facts in the recent period. They present the combination—widening the customer base while deepening relationships—as the current observed pattern driving the business forward.
EPAM · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both sides occurring together in the recent period: new engagements with clients (including specific examples like the European multinational and Global Health Services Company that started less than 12 months ago) alongside growth within the top 20 existing accounts (more than 18% year-over-year) and even stronger growth outside those 20 (34%). They frame this as an observed pattern of widening and deepening the business now, with continued diversification and expansion across both new and existing relationships.
UNH · Q4 2017 → YESThe question is about whether management describes that in the recent period the company's business intensified from BOTH directions at once: new paying counterparties arrived AND existing ones enlarg...YES Management describes both new paying counterparties (e.g., new states like West Virginia, hospitals using Rally, healthcare transformation alliance with 10 companies, acquisitions like Banmedica and DaVita) and existing ones enlarging (e.g., serving nearly 1 million more seniors in Medicare, 465,000 more in commercial group, strong growth with existing client base for PBM, doubled Rally IDs, 7% same-store growth for SCA, highest Q4 script growth).

More from the question bank

New leadership already changing what the comRecently unlocked doorPaid to expand: the company's growth spendinComing out of the tunnelNamed catch-up gapThe company's product is being consumed fastAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.