Upside surprise with durable, still-building causes

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe a clear POSITIVE STEP-UP in the business in the just-reported period — results, orders, volumes, customers, adoption, utilization, or activity that came in meaningfully stronger than the company's own recent norm or its own prior expectations — AND does management attribute that strength mainly to DURABLE, COMPANY-SPECIFIC causes that are still in effect and still building, rather than to one-time, seasonal, or external luck? Answer YES when BOTH halves come through in management's own words, in whatever form fits the business: (1) A REAL STEP-UP THAT ALREADY HAPPENED. Management presents the recent period as a genuine break above the company's own recent trajectory — stronger than what the business had been doing, or ahead of what management itself had planned or expected — grounded in things that actually occurred (actual orders, sales, customers, output, wins, usage, or activity), not merely in hopes, pipeline, or a raised forecast. (2) DURABLE, INTERNAL CAUSES THAT MANAGEMENT SAYS ARE STILL WORKING. When management explains WHY the period was strong, the explanation rests chiefly on things attached to the company itself that persist beyond the quarter — for example, a product, capability, capacity, service, location, technology, or team now in place and performing; customers who have adopted, committed, expanded, or keep returning; a change the company made that is now producing; or a position the company built that keeps generating business — AND management conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that these same drivers remain in effect and have more to contribute in coming periods, so the step-up is presented as the early part of something continuing rather than a spike that is now over. Answer NO if the period was weak, mixed, in-line, or merely stabilizing, with no clear step-up above the company's own recent norm. NO if management attributes the strength mainly to one-time items, a single unusually large order it treats as exceptional, catch-up or pull-forward demand, seasonality, weather, commodity or currency moves, an easy comparison, or broad market/industry conditions rather than to company-specific drivers. NO if management itself cautions that the strength is temporary, is not expected to repeat, or is expected to normalize. NO if the explanation of the strength is generic ("strong execution," "great team," "favorable demand") with no identifiable company-attached cause that persists. NO if the continuation is expressed only as hope or guidance with no still-working driver behind it. NO if the step-up or its causes appear only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.