Working for customers it could not have served a year ago: the company's deliverable capability just stepped up a class
The model's full reasoning — Q3 2023 call → NOWe need to determine if management conveys a capability step-change with all three elements: before/after, paying work, and early relative to what it opens. The transcript discusses several things: expansion into credit, emerging markets, distribution evolution, etc. Key points: - They completed first close of Artisan dislocation opportunities fund, a closed-end drawdown vehicle managed by Bryan Krug and credit team. This is a new capability? But is it paying work? They say "completed the first close" - that means they raised capital, but is that paying work? The fund is new, so it's early. But does it represent a capability they couldn't do a year ago? They had credit team already, they had credit opportunities strategy, etc. The dislocation fund is a new vehicle, but is it a step-change in capability? Possibly they can now offer a drawdown vehicle for dislocated markets, which they couldn't before. But is there paying work? The first close means investors committed capital, but have they deployed? Not clear. They say "designed to provide clients with targeted access to this core competency." It's early. But is it a capability step-change? They already had credit opportunities, floating rate, etc. So it's an extension. - They onboarded a $425 million institutional account in EM local opportunities, $250 million in global unconstrained, and high income had strong flows. These are existing strategies, not new capabilities. They are growing existing businesses. - They mention building out China team, obtaining regulatory approval to execute trades from Hong Kong, placed first trades from there in October. That is a new capability: they can now execute trades from Hong Kong, which they couldn't before. That is a before/after: they obtained regulatory approval and placed first trades. That is a capability step-change in terms of operational presence. Is there paying work? They placed first trades, but that's for existing clients? It's about execution, not new business. It's more operational. - Distribution evolution: they hired first individual to focus exclusively on marketing alternative strategies. That's a new role, but not a capability step-change in what they can do for customers. - They talk about evolving distribution model, but that's internal.
| Ticker | Company | Call | Date | Call grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCKT | The Hackett Group, Inc. | Q1 2024 | 2024-05-08 | C |
| LINC | Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | Q1 2024 | 2024-05-06 | B+ |
| HUYA | HUYA Inc. | Q4 2023 | 2024-03-19 | C |
| PUMP | ProPetro Holding Corp. | Q4 2023 | 2024-02-21 | C+ |
| SANG | Sangoma Technologies Corporation | Q2 2024 | 2024-02-08 | D |
| OPAD | Offerpad Solutions Inc. | Q3 2023 | 2023-11-01 | C |
| TGLS | Tecnoglass Inc. | Q2 2023 | 2023-08-08 | A |
| CARS | Cars.com Inc. | Q1 2023 | 2023-05-06 | B |
| TSSI | TSS, Inc. | Q4 2022 | 2023-04-03 | D |
| TACT | TransAct Technologies Incorporated | Q4 2022 | 2023-03-08 | A |
| M | Macy's, Inc. | Q4 2022 | 2023-03-02 | D |
| CEIX | CONSOL Energy Inc. | Q4 2022 | 2023-02-07 | B |
| KFY | Korn Ferry | Q4 2022 | 2022-06-22 | B |
| ZVIA | Zevia PBC | Q1 2022 | 2022-05-12 | B |
| CNXC | Concentrix Corporation | Q1 2022 | 2022-03-30 | B |
| KD | Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | Q4 2021 | 2022-03-01 | C+ |
| NGVT | Ingevity Corporation | Q4 2021 | 2022-02-25 | B |
| VNDA | Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Q4 2021 | 2022-02-23 | F |
| SLQT | SelectQuote, Inc. | Q2 2022 | 2022-02-07 | F |
| EXP | Eagle Materials Inc. | Q3 2022 | 2022-01-27 | B |
| LC | LendingClub Corporation | Q4 2021 | 2022-01-26 | A |
| SXC | SunCoke Energy, Inc. | Q3 2021 | 2021-11-01 | A |
| LPTH | LightPath Technologies, Inc. | Q4 2021 | 2021-09-09 | D |
| CRS | Carpenter Technology Corporation | Q4 2021 | 2021-08-01 | A |
| UMH | UMH Properties, Inc. | Q3 2018 | 2018-11-02 | C+ |
| AGIO | Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Q3 2018 | 2018-11-01 | C |
| CUBI | Customers Bancorp, Inc. | Q3 2018 | 2018-10-26 | C+ |
| LRN | Stride, Inc. | Q1 2019 | 2018-10-23 | B |
| PRIM | Primoris Services Corporation | Q2 2018 | 2018-08-11 | C+ |
| TOUR | Tuniu Corporation | Q4 2017 | 2018-03-14 | D |
| HSTM | HealthStream, Inc. | Q3 2017 | 2017-10-24 | C |
| PSX | Phillips 66 | Q4 2016 | 2017-02-03 | C+ |
| AEHR | Aehr Test Systems | Q2 2017 | 2017-01-05 | F |
| NTCT | NetScout Systems, Inc. | Q2 2017 | 2016-10-27 | D |
| GOGO | Gogo Inc. | Q1 2016 | 2016-05-06 | C+ |
TGLS · Q2 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management conveys a new capability that they can now do something they couldn't do a year ago, that customers are paying for now, and it's still early. YES Management explicitly contrasts the new capability against the prior limitation: extra capacity now enables them to sell stand-alone architectural glass and aluminum framing products that were previously allocated to window production due to capacity constraints. This is a clear before/after step-change in the class of work they can accept and perform. Real customers are already paying for this new output: the transcript states they have a little bit more installation in stand-alone product sales the rest of the year, and they are now very well positioned to increasingly service large homebuilders’ customers as well as demand for the stand-alone aluminum and glass products, with the absorption of new capacity and ability to offer a wider range of solutions to customers described as positive overall.
TACT · Q4 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, ...YES The transcript shows management describing a clear before/after step-change in casino and gaming printers: they could produce printers before, but now they have added a third line in Q3 and begun manufacturing on a fourth line in Q4, enabling them to meet demand and take market share that the prior competitor could not supply 12 months ago.
ZVIA · Q1 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, ...YES Management describes the launch of single-serve 12-ounce cans as a first-time capability: “we began selling Zevia’s soda in single cans for the first time in a 12-ounce sleek format,” now “available cold in several grocery retailers” with “some of which is shipping now.