Question Bank › Working for customers it could not have served a

Working for customers it could not have served a year ago

Working for customers it could not have served a year ago: the company's deliverable capability just stepped up a class

Calls Tested
498
Answered YES
35
Hit Rate
7%
rare by design

Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2023 call 2023-08-02 A
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2023 call → NO我们根据提供的财报电话会议记录，判断管理层是否传达了公司现在能做一些一年前做不到的事情，并且已有真实客户为此付费，且该业务仍处于早期阶段。 分析关键点： 1. 管理层提到了哪些新能力或改进？ - 零售媒体（Retail Media）业务增长63%，占展示广告收入的10%（去年8%）。 - CTV收入翻倍，占展示广告7%（去年4%）。 - SORT（AI无cookie定向技术）收入增长84%，占展示广告21%（去年14%）。 - 视频增长14%，占展示广告41%（去年44%）。 2. 是否有“之前不能做，现在能做”的对比？ - 管理层描述了零售媒体解决方案：利用数据（零售数据、第三方数据、自有iHUB数据）和AI决策引擎生成动态创意，根据天气等定制广告。这似乎是新能力，但未明确说一年前不能做。 - 提到“SORT”是AI无cookie定向技术，现在可以针对正确的人、正确的时间、正确的产品。但未明确对比一年前。 - 提到“Generative AI”用于生成广告创意和品牌安全，但未明确说这是新能力。 3. 是否有真实客户付费？ - 零售媒体客户包括Kroger、Rite Aid、Home Depot、Albertsons等，他们正在使用该解决方案。这证明有付费客户。 - CTV和SORT也有收入增长，表明有付费。 4. 是否早期？ - 管理层说“Retail Media business continued to accelerate growing 63% year-over-year, accounting for 10% of Display Advertising revenue versus 8% last year.” 这显示增长，但未明确说“早期”或“刚开始”。 - 对于SORT，说“SORT revenue increased by 84% year-over-year, representing 21% of Display Advertising revenue compared with 14% in the second quarter last year.” 同样未明确早期。 - 对于CTV，说“CTV revenue more than doubled compared with the second quarter of 2022, representing 7% of Display Advertising revenue versus 4% last year.” 也未明确早期。 5. 是否有“之前不能做，现在能做”的明确对比？ - 管理层提到“We are replacing the outdated circular that has been around for over a 100 years with the accuracy of digital targeting.” 这暗示了零售媒体是新的，但未明确说一年前不能做。 - 提到“thanks to SORT, our AI-based cookieless targeting technology. We can now target the right product to the right person at the right moment.” 这暗示了现在能做，但未明确对比。 6. 是否有“能力提升”的明确表述？ - 管理层说“Our dynamic retail solution is distributed across all our media channels” 但未明确说这是新能力。 - 提到“we are now adding another layer of the Generative AI to add brand safety” 这似乎是新东西，但未明确说一年前没有。 7. 是否有“早期”的表述？ - 管理层说“we are constantly looking to add more and more publishers” 对于搜索，但那是搜索业务。 - 对于零售媒体，未说“早期”。 - 对于CTV，未说“早期”。 8. 是否有“现在能处理更大订单”等？ - 未明确。 综合来看，管理层提到了增长，但未明确对比“一年前不能做，现在能做”的具体能力变化。虽然零售媒体、CTV、SORT都有增长，但可能只是业务扩展，而非能力跃升。而且未明确说这些业务仍处于早期阶段。 因此，答案应为NO。

← Back to the full PERI analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING — produce, deliver, serve, handle, or perform at a scale, specification, quality, or complexity — that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, with the business it enables still early? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent capability step-change with all three present: (1) A BEFORE/AFTER IN WHAT THE COMPANY CAN DO: management contrasts — directly or plainly in substance — what the company can now execute against what it could not previously execute: bigger orders or projects than it could formerly take, specifications or performance levels it could not formerly meet, volumes it could not formerly produce, customer classes it could not formerly support, or work it formerly had to decline or subcontract that it now performs itself; (2) THE CAPABILITY IS PROVEN BY PAYING WORK, NOT ASSERTED: real customers are currently paying for output that exercises the new capability — actual orders delivered, projects performed, volumes shipped, or engagements running now that would have been impossible for the company a year ago, described with operating substance; and (3) EARLY RELATIVE TO WHAT IT OPENS: management conveys that the class of business this capability admits the company to is mostly still ahead — the first such engagements are done or underway, more are forming, and the reported results reflect only the beginning of operating at the new level. Answer NO if the new capability is still being built, tested, or awaiting qualification with no paying work exercising it. NO if the step-up is routine incremental improvement rather than a change in what class of work the company can take. NO if the claim is generic ('expanded capabilities,' 'enhanced platform') without concrete before/after substance and paying proof. NO if the newly enabled business is already mature and fully in the numbers. NO if the capability story appears only in an analyst's question management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-08 C
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Q1 2024 2024-05-06 B+
HUYA HUYA Inc. Q4 2023 2024-03-19 C
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. Q4 2023 2024-02-21 C+
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corporation Q2 2024 2024-02-08 D
OPAD Offerpad Solutions Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C
TGLS Tecnoglass Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-08 A
CARS Cars.com Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-06 B
TSSI TSS, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-04-03 D
TACT TransAct Technologies Incorporated Q4 2022 2023-03-08 A
M Macy's, Inc. Q4 2022 2023-03-02 D
CEIX CONSOL Energy Inc. Q4 2022 2023-02-07 B
KFY Korn Ferry Q4 2022 2022-06-22 B
ZVIA Zevia PBC Q1 2022 2022-05-12 B
CNXC Concentrix Corporation Q1 2022 2022-03-30 B
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-01 C+
NGVT Ingevity Corporation Q4 2021 2022-02-25 B
VNDA Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. Q4 2021 2022-02-23 F
SLQT SelectQuote, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-02-07 F
EXP Eagle Materials Inc. Q3 2022 2022-01-27 B
LC LendingClub Corporation Q4 2021 2022-01-26 A
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-01 A
LPTH LightPath Technologies, Inc. Q4 2021 2021-09-09 D
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation Q4 2021 2021-08-01 A
UMH UMH Properties, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-11-02 C+
AGIO Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-11-01 C
CUBI Customers Bancorp, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-10-26 C+
LRN Stride, Inc. Q1 2019 2018-10-23 B
PRIM Primoris Services Corporation Q2 2018 2018-08-11 C+
TOUR Tuniu Corporation Q4 2017 2018-03-14 D
HSTM HealthStream, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-24 C
PSX Phillips 66 Q4 2016 2017-02-03 C+
AEHR Aehr Test Systems Q2 2017 2017-01-05 F
NTCT NetScout Systems, Inc. Q2 2017 2016-10-27 D
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+

How the model reasoned

TGLS · Q2 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management conveys a new capability that they can now do something they couldn't do a year ago, that customers are paying for now, and it's still early. YES Management explicitly contrasts the new capability against the prior limitation: extra capacity now enables them to sell stand-alone architectural glass and aluminum framing products that were previously allocated to window production due to capacity constraints. This is a clear before/after step-change in the class of work they can accept and perform. Real customers are already paying for this new output: the transcript states they have a little bit more installation in stand-alone product sales the rest of the year, and they are now very well positioned to increasingly service large homebuilders’ customers as well as demand for the stand-alone aluminum and glass products, with the absorption of new capacity and ability to offer a wider range of solutions to customers described as positive overall.
TACT · Q4 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, ...YES The transcript shows management describing a clear before/after step-change in casino and gaming printers: they could produce printers before, but now they have added a third line in Q3 and begun manufacturing on a fourth line in Q4, enabling them to meet demand and take market share that the prior competitor could not supply 12 months ago.
ZVIA · Q1 2022 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that the company CAN NOW ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING that it COULD NOT DO ROUGHLY A YEAR AGO, and that REAL CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR THAT NEW CAPABILITY NOW, ...YES Management describes the launch of single-serve 12-ounce cans as a first-time capability: “we began selling Zevia’s soda in single cans for the first time in a 12-ounce sleek format,” now “available cold in several grocery retailers” with “some of which is shipping now.

More from the question bank

The product is disappearing into reorder rhyVolume records through a still-fixed gateNamed catch-up gapSelling something whose payoff to the buyer Paid to expand: the company's growth spendinTone of discovery: management sounds newly sAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.