StocksM › MPX

Marine Products Corporation (MPX) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 39 of MPX's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q2 2025 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
C+
Q1 2025
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
39
2016–2025
Avg Candor
7.1/9
evasion 2.2/9
High CandorSkeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionUnderused Fixed CostsRaising PricesMargins ContractingQuestion Left HangingResults Worse Than Direction

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q2 2025 earnings call 2025-07-24 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q2 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of MPX's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

C+ Q1 2025 earnings call 2025-04-24 move ±10.2%

Management held guidance steady against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: contractingPricing: raisingCapex: decreasing
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Resolves doubtsDirection beats results
Candor 8/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 2/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

B+ Q4 2024 earnings call 2025-01-30 move ±8.6%

Management gave no formal guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Demand: mixedMargins: stablePricing: under pressureCapex: decreasing 1 analysts · 5 questions
✓ Clean call✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Resolves doubtsDirection beats results
Candor 8/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 2/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 2/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
NO Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q3 2024 earnings call 2024-10-24 move ±8.6%

Management held guidance steady against slowing demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: slowingMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: stableHeadcount: cuttingCapex: flat 1 analysts · 5 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Resolves doubtsDirection beats results
Candor 8/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 2/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q2 2024 earnings call 2024-07-25 move ±11.7%

Management gave no formal guidance against slowing demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Demand: slowingMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: stableCapex: increasing 1 analysts · 5 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hangingDirection beats results
Candor 8/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 5/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 2/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

D Q1 2024 earnings call 2024-04-25 move ±10.1%

Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid.

Demand: stableMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: under pressure 1 analysts · 4 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
Candor 7/9
Specificity 6/9
Evasion 4/9
Confidence 5/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 3/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q4 2023 earnings call 2024-01-25 move ±10.4%

Management gave no formal guidance against slowing demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Demand: slowingMargins: contractingBacklog: shrinkingPricing: under pressureCapex: increasing 2 analysts · 8 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up ahead⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 7/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 6/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 3/9
Complexity 2/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C Q3 2023 earnings call 2023-10-25 move ±10.4%

Management gave no formal guidance against slowing demand. The delivery was unusually candid.

Demand: slowingMargins: stableBacklog: shrinkingPricing: raising 1 analysts · 6 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 6/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 5/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 3/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+ nonemixedexpanding 7/9 0/9
Q1 2023 2023-04-26 C+ nonestablestable 7/9 2/9
Q4 2022 2023-01-25 B+ maintainedstablestable 7/9 1/9
Q3 2022 2022-10-26 B+ nonestableexpanding 7/9 0/9
Q2 2022 2022-07-27 B+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2022 2022-04-27 C+ nonestableexpanding 8/9 2/9
Q4 2021 2022-01-26 C+ noneacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2021 2021-10-27 C+ noneacceleratingcontracting 7/9 0/9
Q2 2021 2021-07-28 A noneacceleratingexpanding 7/9 0/9
Q1 2021 2021-05-02 B noneacceleratingexpanding 7/9 0/9
Q4 2020 2021-01-27 B+ raisedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q3 2020 2020-10-28 B noneacceleratingexpanding 7/9 0/9
Q2 2020 2020-08-01 B noneacceleratingcontracting 8/9 2/9
Q1 2020 2020-04-29 D withdrawnmixedcontracting 7/9 4/9
Q4 2019 2020-01-29 C+ nonemixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q3 2019 2019-10-23 F loweredmixedcontracting 7/9 4/9
Q2 2019 2019-07-24 D nonestableexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q1 2019 2019-04-24 A maintainedmixedcontracting 8/9 2/9
Q4 2018 2019-01-23 C+ nonemixedcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q3 2018 2018-10-24 B+ maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 2/9
Q2 2018 2018-07-25 C+ noneacceleratingstable 7/9 4/9
Q1 2018 2018-04-25 B+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2017 2018-01-24 C+ noneacceleratingexpanding 6/9 3/9
Q3 2017 2017-10-25 C+ nonestableexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q2 2017 2017-07-26 C+ noneacceleratingexpanding 6/9 2/9
Q1 2017 2017-04-26 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2016 2017-01-25 B+ noneacceleratingcontracting 7/9 2/9
Q3 2016 2016-10-26 B+ noneacceleratingstable 7/9 3/9
Q2 2016 2016-07-27 A raisedacceleratingstable 7/9 1/9
Q1 2016 2016-04-27 C+ maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 3/9
Q4 2015 2016-01-27 B noneacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

AA · Alcoa CorporationAAALF · Aareal Bank AGAABKF · Aareal Bank AGAAGIY · AIA Group LimitedAAL · American Airlines Group AAPL · Apple Inc.

MPWR   All “M” companies    MPXEF

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.