TechPrecision Corporation (TPCS) — Earnings Call X-Ray
Our AI read all 33 of TPCS's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.
Previous Call Grade
F
Q1 2025
Calls Analyzed
33
2016–2025
Avg Candor
5.6/9
evasion 6.2/9
Call-by-call analysis
🔒 Q2 2025 earnings call
2025-01-23
NEWEST
Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■
Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■
■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.
🔒 The Q2 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of TPCS's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock
F
Q1 2025 earnings call
2024-11-14
move ±17.8%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics, frequently evasive.
Demand: stableMargins: contractingBacklog: stableCapex: increasing
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
F
Q3 2024 earnings call
2024-02-29
move ±19.8%
Management gave no formal guidance against accelerating demand and contracting margins. The delivery was frequently evasive, visibly under pressure.
Demand: acceleratingMargins: contractingBacklog: growingPricing: stableHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 4 analysts · 17 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Volume step-up aheadDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
F
Q2 2024 earnings call
2023-11-21
move ±8.1%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was guarded, light on specifics, frequently evasive.
Demand: stableMargins: contractingBacklog: stableCapex: increasing 6 analysts · 30 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Prepayments growing✓ Volume step-up ahead⚑ Reads rehearsedDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
YES Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
F
Q1 2024 earnings call
2023-08-21
move ±9.6%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was light on specifics, frequently evasive, visibly under pressure.
Demand: stableMargins: contractingBacklog: growingCapex: increasing 3 analysts · 12 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hangingDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
From the research question bank
1 more research questions answered NO
F
Q4 2023 earnings call
2023-06-15
move ±11.9%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand. The delivery was frequently evasive.
Demand: stableMargins: mixedBacklog: growingCapex: flat 5 analysts · 22 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hangingDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
F
Q3 2023 earnings call
2023-02-14
move ±17%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand and expanding margins. The delivery was frequently evasive, visibly under pressure.
Demand: stableMargins: expandingBacklog: growingPricing: under pressureCapex: flat 1 analysts · 12 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Prepayments growing✓ Volume step-up aheadDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
YES Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
YES Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
YES Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
F
Q2 2023 earnings call
2022-11-17
move ±12%
Management gave no formal guidance against steady demand. The delivery was frequently evasive, visibly under pressure.
Demand: stableBacklog: growingCapex: increasing 4 analysts · 18 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition⚑ Question left hanging✓ Volume step-up aheadHidden segmentDirection beats results
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
NO Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
NO Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
NO Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
NO Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
YES Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
YES Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?
Earlier calls
| Call | Date | Grade | Guidance | Demand | Margins | Candor | Evasion |
|---|
| Q1 2023 |
2022-08-22 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
5/9 |
8/9 |
| Q4 2022 |
2022-07-13 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
6/9 |
6/9 |
| Q3 2022 |
2022-02-17 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
6/9 |
7/9 |
| Q2 2022 |
2021-12-07 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
4/9 |
8/9 |
| Q1 2022 |
2021-08-12 |
C+ |
none | accelerating | expanding |
6/9 |
6/9 |
| Q3 2021 |
2021-02-11 |
F |
none | accelerating | expanding |
4/9 |
8/9 |
| Q2 2021 |
2020-11-12 |
F |
maintained | accelerating | expanding |
4/9 |
6/9 |
| Q1 2021 |
2020-08-13 |
F |
maintained | mixed | contracting |
7/9 |
6/9 |
| Q4 2020 |
2020-06-11 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
5/9 |
6/9 |
| Q4 2019 |
2020-02-13 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
7/9 |
6/9 |
| Q2 2020 |
2019-11-13 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
6/9 |
8/9 |
| Q1 2020 |
2019-08-13 |
F |
none | unclear | contracting |
6/9 |
7/9 |
| Q4 2019 |
2019-06-27 |
F |
maintained | accelerating | expanding |
4/9 |
7/9 |
| Q3 2019 |
2019-02-13 |
F |
none | accelerating | expanding |
6/9 |
7/9 |
| Q2 2019 |
2018-11-13 |
F |
none | accelerating | expanding |
5/9 |
8/9 |
| Q1 2019 |
2018-08-16 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
5/9 |
6/9 |
| Q4 2018 |
2018-06-28 |
F |
none | accelerating | contracting |
4/9 |
7/9 |
| Q2 2018 |
2017-11-13 |
F |
none | accelerating | stable |
6/9 |
6/9 |
| Q1 2018 |
2017-08-14 |
C+ |
none | accelerating | expanding |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q4 2017 |
2017-06-28 |
D |
none | mixed | contracting |
6/9 |
5/9 |
| Q3 2017 |
2017-02-16 |
C |
none | mixed | expanding |
7/9 |
2/9 |
| Q2 2017 |
2016-11-16 |
C+ |
none | stable | expanding |
7/9 |
3/9 |
| Q1 2017 |
2016-08-15 |
D |
none | stable | expanding |
6/9 |
4/9 |
| Q4 2016 |
2016-06-28 |
C+ |
none | stable | expanding |
7/9 |
3/9 |
| Q3 2016 |
2016-02-16 |
F |
none | stable | expanding |
4/9 |
7/9 |
How to read this page
The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.
Companies with similar call quality
← TPCO All “T” companies
TPG →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our
methodology.