Cash generation just crossed over

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that the company has RECENTLY CROSSED FROM CONSUMING CASH TO PRODUCING IT — that the business has just begun to generate more cash than it uses, or has just reached the point where it can fund its own operations and growth from internally generated funds — and does management treat this crossover as a change in the company's financial character that alters how they now allocate capital? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent development with both halves present: (1) THE CROSSOVER IS DESCRIBED AS HAVING JUST HAPPENED OR AS HAPPENING NOW. Management indicates that the company has reached, or has just passed, the point where the business pays for itself — for example, describing a first period of positive cash generation, free cash flow turning positive, the company no longer needing outside funding to operate or grow, burn having ended or reversed, an inflection from negative to positive cash after a long period of consuming it, debt being paid down out of operating cash rather than refinanced, or the balance sheet improving because the business itself is throwing off money. It must be presented as an achieved or currently-occurring reality — not a target for a future year, not a projection, and not a normal quarter for a company that has always been cash-generative. (2) MANAGEMENT'S ATTENTION HAS MOVED TO WHAT TO DO WITH THE CASH. Because the company now funds itself, management is visibly deciding how to deploy the surplus rather than how to survive or how to raise money — for example, describing choices among reinvesting in growth, adding capacity, paying down remaining obligations, buying back stock, acquiring something, or simply building the cash position, and conveying that these are now real choices the company gets to make with its own money. The essence is ONE phenomenon: a business that used to depend on outside capital, or on the patience of its lenders and shareholders, has just become self-funding, and management is speaking from a position of financial independence for the first time in a while. The specific form — an early-stage company reaching self-sustainability, a capital-intensive company finishing a heavy build, a leveraged company whose cash now exceeds its obligations, a turnaround whose operations finally cover themselves — may vary widely. Answer NO if the company has long been comfortably cash-generative and this quarter is simply more of the same. NO if positive cash flow is only forecast, targeted, promised for a later year, or contingent on things not yet done. NO if cash improved only because of a one-time item — an asset sale, a tax refund, a financing, a working-capital swing management itself calls temporary — rather than because the operating business now covers itself. NO if management is still discussing how much runway is left, when the next raise will be, or how to fund the gap. NO if the discussion is routine capital-allocation commentary from a financially unremarkable company with no crossover to describe. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or characterization that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.