Management is voluntarily narrowing the company

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management describe that the company is DELIBERATELY MAKING ITSELF SMALLER IN SCOPE in order to concentrate on a narrower part of what it does — that is, actively walking away from, winding down, selling, closing, de-emphasizing, or refusing business, product lines, customers, channels, geographies, or activities that the company itself chose to be in — and does management present this narrowing as an already-initiated decision about what the company will no longer be, rather than as cost cutting or a response to weak demand? Answer YES when management's own words convey BOTH of the following as one coherent posture: (1) A REAL SUBTRACTION ALREADY IN MOTION: management identifies something the company is giving up or has just given up — exiting a market, line, format, or service; discontinuing or pruning products or SKUs; divesting, shutting, or shrinking a unit, plant, brand, or footprint; letting go of low-quality revenue, unprofitable accounts, or customers it no longer wants; stepping back from a channel, contract type, or category — and describes this as a decision already taken and being executed, with revenue or activity knowingly being forgone as a result. (2) A DELIBERATE CONCENTRATION RATIONALE: management frames the subtraction as freeing the company's capital, capacity, people, or attention to go deeper into the part of the business it believes matters most, and conveys that the remaining, narrower company is expected to be a fundamentally better business — higher quality, faster growing, more defensible, or economically superior — even if it is smaller in the near term. The narrowing may take whatever form fits the business, and the "one thing" it concentrates on may be a product, market, customer type, capability, or model. Answer NO if the only downsizing described is generic cost reduction, headcount cuts, restructuring for efficiency, or belt-tightening in response to a downturn, with no change in what businesses or customers the company chooses to serve. NO if the company is chiefly broadening — adding lines, markets, or acquisitions — without giving anything up. NO if the exit is forced on the company (a customer left, a contract was lost, a plant burned, a regulator banned it) rather than chosen. NO if the pruning is routine annual SKU housekeeping or immaterial to how the company is positioned. NO if the narrowing is only under review, being explored, or promised for the future rather than already being executed. NO if management gives no sense that the remaining business is meant to be better, only that losses are being stopped. NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question that management does not itself adopt. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.