Question Bank › Physical throughput records at the operating lev

Physical throughput records at the operating level, told in operating units

Calls Tested
500
Answered YES
23
Hit Rate
4.6%
rare by design

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2016 call 2016-08-04 B
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2016 call → NOWe need to determine if management reports a record or step-change level of physical/operational output achieved in the recent period, with expectation of continued growth due to ongoing drivers. The transcript covers Q2 2016 earnings call. Need to find any mention of record output in operating terms (units, megawatts, customers, etc.) that is a high for the company's history or a clear step above prior range, and management expects it to continue due to underlying drivers. The transcript discusses financial results, strategic initiatives, coal ash, regulatory filings, load growth, etc. Look for phrases like "record", "highest", "step above", "all-time high", etc. in operating context. - On slide 5-6: They mention progress on capital projects, but no record output. - On slide 8: "Year-to-date, our nuclear fleet has achieved a 96% capacity factor. At Oconee Unit 3 in the Carolinas our team set a new record for shortest outage time, an improvement of 10% over the prior period." That is a record for outage time? But that's about outage duration, not output. It's an operational achievement but not about production output. Also, it's not about output level rising; it's about a shorter outage. Not a record of highest output. - On retail load: They mention rolling 12-month weather-normalized load growth of 0.3%, residential customer growth 1.4%, etc. No record. - On commercial renewables: They mention achieving commercial operation of Los Vientos IV wind project, etc. No record. - On coal ash: progress, but no record. - On dividends: no. - The only "record" is the nuclear outage record, but that's not about output level; it's about shortest outage time, not about producing at highest level. - There is also mention of "exceeded the $687 million guarantee fuel and joint dispatch merger savings" - that's financial savings, not physical output. - No mention of any record production, capacity factor record, customer count record, etc. in the context of "highest level in company's history" for output. - The closest is 96% nuclear capacity factor year-to-date, but that's not stated as a record, and it's not clear if it's the highest ever. Also, they don't say it's expected to continue rising. - Also, they mention "strong generation fleet performance" but no specifics. - There is no indication of step-change output. Thus, answer is NO.

← Back to the full DUK analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management report that the company's PHYSICAL OR OPERATIONAL OUTPUT — units produced, shipped, delivered, installed, processed, treated, transported, opened, served, or performed, in whatever operating unit fits the industry — has JUST REACHED THE HIGHEST LEVEL IN THE COMPANY'S OWN HISTORY OR A CLEAR STEP ABOVE ITS PRIOR OPERATING RANGE, and does management BOTH ground this in specific operating quantities or milestones actually achieved in the recent period AND indicate that output is expected to continue rising from here because the drivers behind it (capacity, customers, or committed work already in place) are still building? Answer YES when management's own words convey this one phenomenon: a record or step-change level of real physical activity, described in operating terms rather than only in revenue or financial terms, achieved in the just-reported period, with management conveying — directly or plainly in substance — that this level is a waypoint rather than a peak because the same already-existing drivers continue. The output measure may take any form native to the business. Answer NO if the only records cited are financial (revenue, EPS, margins) with no operating quantity behind them. NO if the record output is attributed by management chiefly to a one-time event, catch-up, pull-forward, or condition it expects to unwind. NO if management presents the level as a peak, describes output flattening or declining, or hedges that it cannot be sustained. NO if higher output is only forecast or targeted rather than already achieved. NO if the record framing appears only in an analyst's summary that management does not itself state. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
MNKD MannKind Corporation Q4 2023 2024-02-27 C
DXCM DexCom, Inc. Q4 2023 2024-02-08 B+
GPRE Green Plains Inc. Q4 2023 2024-02-07 F
AKYA Akoya Biosciences, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-07 C+
ET Energy Transfer LP Q2 2023 2023-08-02 C+
BRX Brixmor Property Group Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-02 A
BKH Black Hills Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-08 D
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
EXFY Expensify, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-12 D
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-04 B
ZH Zhihu Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-22 D
RNW ReNew Energy Global Plc Q2 2022 2021-11-18 C
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-10 B+
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
HOLX Hologic, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-08 D
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. Q4 2016 2017-03-03 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
HD The Home Depot, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-23 A

How the model reasoned

SIBN · Q3 2022 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's physical or operational output has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...YES The transcript explicitly states "25% growth in procedure volumes versus the prior year period" and "record active surgeon base of over 800 surgeons," framing these as achieved milestones in the just-reported quarter. Management ties the growth to ongoing demand drivers ("continued acceleration in procedure demand"), indicating the level is a waypoint rather than a peak, with output expected to continue rising as the same drivers persist. This constitutes a clear step above prior operating range in physical activity (procedures performed), grounded in recent operating quantities and sustained by building capacity/customers.
BRX · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's PHYSICAL OR OPERATIONAL OUTPUT has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...NO The transcript shows management highlighting record occupancy levels (94% overall and 89.3% for small shops) as well as leasing activity and signed leases, but these are framed as utilization or pipeline metrics rather than a record level of physical output such as units produced, shipped, delivered, opened, or performed.
CRGO · Q1 2024 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's physical or operational output has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...

More from the question bank

Small reported base, oversized already-contrConstraint-side candorRepeat expansion inside the base while new lThe economics improved before the volume arrNamed counterparty roster suddenly upgraded Free option on their own operationsAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.