Question Bank › Physical throughput records at the operating lev

Physical throughput records at the operating level, told in operating units

Calls Tested
500
Answered YES
23
Hit Rate
4.6%
rare by design

Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) — this company's answers

NO on the Q4 2016 call 2017-02-14 A
The model's full reasoning — Q4 2016 call → NOWe need to answer based solely on the transcript. The question asks whether management reports that the company's physical/operational output has just reached the highest level in its history or a clear step above prior range, and management both grounds this in specific operating quantities achieved in recent period AND indicates output expected to continue rising because drivers are still building. Scan transcript for such claims. Mike Moore: "2016 proved to be a defining year... existing asset base provided another year of record production growth, an increase of 32% over 2015" - that's production growth, not necessarily highest level in history? But "record production growth" means growth rate not level. However later: "our year-end total proved reserves increased 36% year-over-year" - that's reserves, not actual production output. They talk about production forecast for 2017 increase of 45% to 53% over 2016, but that's future. Did they say actual production output reached highest level ever? They mention "another year of record production growth" - that is growth, not level. Also "2016 results have placed us in a position of strength... increase activity levels" - but no explicit statement that output hit an all-time high or step above prior range. They mention record production growth but that's percentage increase. They don't cite specific production volumes achieved. They do give guidance for 2017 production of 1-1.1 Bcf/d, but that's forecast. Look for any statement about physical output being highest ever. They mention "2020" no. They mention "record" in drilling metrics: "We beat nearly all of our footage per day records" - that's drilling efficiency, not overall output. Also "average spud to rig release" etc. But those are efficiency metrics, not company-wide output. The question is about physical output like units produced shipped etc. The company's primary output is natural gas, oil, NGLs. Did they say they achieved record production levels? They said "another year of record production growth" - growth rate, not absolute level. They also said "2016 results" and "record production growth" but not record production level. They might mean record growth, but they didn't say "record production" or "highest ever" for the level.

← Back to the full GPOR analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management report that the company's PHYSICAL OR OPERATIONAL OUTPUT — units produced, shipped, delivered, installed, processed, treated, transported, opened, served, or performed, in whatever operating unit fits the industry — has JUST REACHED THE HIGHEST LEVEL IN THE COMPANY'S OWN HISTORY OR A CLEAR STEP ABOVE ITS PRIOR OPERATING RANGE, and does management BOTH ground this in specific operating quantities or milestones actually achieved in the recent period AND indicate that output is expected to continue rising from here because the drivers behind it (capacity, customers, or committed work already in place) are still building? Answer YES when management's own words convey this one phenomenon: a record or step-change level of real physical activity, described in operating terms rather than only in revenue or financial terms, achieved in the just-reported period, with management conveying — directly or plainly in substance — that this level is a waypoint rather than a peak because the same already-existing drivers continue. The output measure may take any form native to the business. Answer NO if the only records cited are financial (revenue, EPS, margins) with no operating quantity behind them. NO if the record output is attributed by management chiefly to a one-time event, catch-up, pull-forward, or condition it expects to unwind. NO if management presents the level as a peak, describes output flattening or declining, or hedges that it cannot be sustained. NO if higher output is only forecast or targeted rather than already achieved. NO if the record framing appears only in an analyst's summary that management does not itself state. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
MNKD MannKind Corporation Q4 2023 2024-02-27 C
DXCM DexCom, Inc. Q4 2023 2024-02-08 B+
GPRE Green Plains Inc. Q4 2023 2024-02-07 F
AKYA Akoya Biosciences, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-07 C+
ET Energy Transfer LP Q2 2023 2023-08-02 C+
BRX Brixmor Property Group Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-02 A
BKH Black Hills Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-08 D
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
EXFY Expensify, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-12 D
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-04 B
ZH Zhihu Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-22 D
RNW ReNew Energy Global Plc Q2 2022 2021-11-18 C
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-10 B+
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
HOLX Hologic, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-08 D
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. Q4 2016 2017-03-03 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
HD The Home Depot, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-23 A

How the model reasoned

SIBN · Q3 2022 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's physical or operational output has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...YES The transcript explicitly states "25% growth in procedure volumes versus the prior year period" and "record active surgeon base of over 800 surgeons," framing these as achieved milestones in the just-reported quarter. Management ties the growth to ongoing demand drivers ("continued acceleration in procedure demand"), indicating the level is a waypoint rather than a peak, with output expected to continue rising as the same drivers persist. This constitutes a clear step above prior operating range in physical activity (procedures performed), grounded in recent operating quantities and sustained by building capacity/customers.
BRX · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's PHYSICAL OR OPERATIONAL OUTPUT has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...NO The transcript shows management highlighting record occupancy levels (94% overall and 89.3% for small shops) as well as leasing activity and signed leases, but these are framed as utilization or pipeline metrics rather than a record level of physical output such as units produced, shipped, delivered, opened, or performed.
CRGO · Q1 2024 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's physical or operational output has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...

More from the question bank

Small reported base, oversized already-contrConstraint-side candorRepeat expansion inside the base while new lThe economics improved before the volume arrNamed counterparty roster suddenly upgraded Free option on their own operationsAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.