Question Bank › Physical throughput records at the operating lev

Physical throughput records at the operating level, told in operating units

Calls Tested
500
Answered YES
23
Hit Rate
4.6%
rare by design

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) — this company's answers

NO on the Q2 2018 call 2018-07-27 C
The model's full reasoning — Q2 2018 call → NOWe need answer only YES or NO. Need determine if management reports physical/operational output just reached highest level in company's own history or clear step above prior operating range, grounded in specific operating quantities/milestones achieved, and indicates output expected to continue rising due to drivers building. Use only transcript. Need assess. Transcript: Neil Chapman says "record quarterly Mobil 1 sales in U.S. and China" in Q2? In Downstream results: "record quarterly Mobil 1 sales in the U.S. and China" - that is physical output? Sales volume, not production. But is it highest level in company's history? It says record quarterly Mobil 1 sales. Management states. Also "We completed startup of 230,000-ton Singapore Specialties... contains world's largest adhesive tackifier units and world-scale halobutyl plant." That's capacity not output. ConfCall mentions "Now at full capacity" etc. Need find specific operating quantities achieved and expected to continue. "Papua New Guinea... operations have now returned to full capacity. And our plant already is consistently operating more than 20% above original design capacity" That's a step above prior operating range? It is operating above design capacity, not necessarily highest in history? It says "more than 20% above original design capacity" - physical output achieved, expected to continue? Also "Production in PNG reached full capacity in April... now consistently operating above original design capacity." But is that highest level in company's history? For PNG plant, not company history. But question says "highest level in the company's own history" or "clear step above its prior operating range" - Could be "operating more than 20% above original design capacity" is clear step above prior operating range? But management does not explicitly say expected to continue rising from here because drivers build? They say "believes this forms a solid foundation to progress expansions." But for PNG output, it's back to full capacity after earthquake, not new record? Actually design capacity exceeded by 20% is above original design. But is that "just reached highest level" in company history? Not necessarily; may have been above design before. Also "Kearl anticipates producing 200,000 barrels per day this year...

← Back to the full XOM analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management report that the company's PHYSICAL OR OPERATIONAL OUTPUT — units produced, shipped, delivered, installed, processed, treated, transported, opened, served, or performed, in whatever operating unit fits the industry — has JUST REACHED THE HIGHEST LEVEL IN THE COMPANY'S OWN HISTORY OR A CLEAR STEP ABOVE ITS PRIOR OPERATING RANGE, and does management BOTH ground this in specific operating quantities or milestones actually achieved in the recent period AND indicate that output is expected to continue rising from here because the drivers behind it (capacity, customers, or committed work already in place) are still building? Answer YES when management's own words convey this one phenomenon: a record or step-change level of real physical activity, described in operating terms rather than only in revenue or financial terms, achieved in the just-reported period, with management conveying — directly or plainly in substance — that this level is a waypoint rather than a peak because the same already-existing drivers continue. The output measure may take any form native to the business. Answer NO if the only records cited are financial (revenue, EPS, margins) with no operating quantity behind them. NO if the record output is attributed by management chiefly to a one-time event, catch-up, pull-forward, or condition it expects to unwind. NO if management presents the level as a peak, describes output flattening or declining, or hedges that it cannot be sustained. NO if higher output is only forecast or targeted rather than already achieved. NO if the record framing appears only in an analyst's summary that management does not itself state. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
PBR Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Q4 2023 2024-03-08 D
MNKD MannKind Corporation Q4 2023 2024-02-27 C
DXCM DexCom, Inc. Q4 2023 2024-02-08 B+
GPRE Green Plains Inc. Q4 2023 2024-02-07 F
AKYA Akoya Biosciences, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-07 C+
ET Energy Transfer LP Q2 2023 2023-08-02 C+
BRX Brixmor Property Group Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-02 A
BKH Black Hills Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-08 D
SIBN SI-BONE, Inc. Q3 2022 2022-11-07 C+
EXFY Expensify, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-12 D
EVGO EVgo, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-09 C+
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-04 B
ZH Zhihu Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-22 D
RNW ReNew Energy Global Plc Q2 2022 2021-11-18 C
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. Q2 2021 2021-08-10 B+
OGE OGE Energy Corp. Q3 2018 2018-11-08 A
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Q2 2018 2018-07-19 B+
HOLX Hologic, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-08 D
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. Q4 2016 2017-03-03 B+
GOGO Gogo Inc. Q1 2016 2016-05-06 C+
HD The Home Depot, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-23 A

How the model reasoned

SIBN · Q3 2022 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's physical or operational output has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...YES The transcript explicitly states "25% growth in procedure volumes versus the prior year period" and "record active surgeon base of over 800 surgeons," framing these as achieved milestones in the just-reported quarter. Management ties the growth to ongoing demand drivers ("continued acceleration in procedure demand"), indicating the level is a waypoint rather than a peak, with output expected to continue rising as the same drivers persist. This constitutes a clear step above prior operating range in physical activity (procedures performed), grounded in recent operating quantities and sustained by building capacity/customers.
BRX · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's PHYSICAL OR OPERATIONAL OUTPUT has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...NO The transcript shows management highlighting record occupancy levels (94% overall and 89.3% for small shops) as well as leasing activity and signed leases, but these are framed as utilization or pipeline metrics rather than a record level of physical output such as units produced, shipped, delivered, opened, or performed.
CRGO · Q1 2024 → YESThe question is about whether management reports that the company's physical or operational output has just reached the highest level in the company's history or a clear step above its prior operating...

More from the question bank

Small reported base, oversized already-contrConstraint-side candorRepeat expansion inside the base while new lThe economics improved before the volume arrNamed counterparty roster suddenly upgraded Free option on their own operationsAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.