Profit machinery upgraded while volume still arriving

American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) — this company's answers

The model's full reasoning — Q4 2016 call → NOWe need to answer YES or NO based solely on the transcript. The question asks: Does management convey that the company has ALREADY ACHIEVED A STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT IN HOW MUCH IT KEEPS FROM EACH UNIT OF BUSINESS — through changes the company itself made that are now visible in the recent period's actual results — AND that business volume is SIMULTANEOUSLY GROWING onto that improved structure, so each arriving increment converts to profit at the new, better rate with most of that arriving volume still ahead of the reported results? We need both halves. Let's parse the transcript. Management discusses several projects: Torrey Plaza renovation, Oregon Square, Waikele shopping center repositioning. They also talk about Hassalo (multifamily) occupancy, City Center Bellevue leasing, etc. We need to see if they say they have achieved a structural improvement in per-unit economics (e.g., higher rents per square foot, better margins) that is already realized in recent results, and that volume is growing with most still ahead. Look for statements about actual results: "FFO growth increased 5% for the year ended December 31, 2016. Same store cash NOI also increased 5%." But that's overall, not necessarily structural improvement. They mention retail occupancy down, office occupancy down. They mention renewals with higher rents: "On a comparable basis the annual cash basis rent increased 6.6% over the prior leases" for retail, and office "increased 12% over the prior leases." That indicates they are getting higher rents on renewals, but that is a realized improvement in per-unit economics (rent per square foot). But is that a structural improvement? It could be market-driven. But they say "We are very pleased with our FFO growth...". However, we need to see if it's attributed to company actions, not just market. They also talk about Waikele: they have a signed LOI with a national grocer for Sports Authority space, and they are repositioning the Kmart space. That is future, not realized yet. They say Kmart is gone but still paying through June 2018. So that is a drag, not an improvement. They talk about Torrey Point development, but that's not yet stabilized. They talk about Hassalo: "Hassalo was flat for the fourth quarter overall. We have seen some softening... we are adjusting our estimated occupancy down." So that's not a structural improvement.

← Back to the full AAT analysis