Promise already turning into fact

Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management point to a growth-bearing development in its business that IT HAD PREVIOUSLY TOLD INVESTORS TO EXPECT — and demonstrate, with real current-period activity, that this development is NOW ACTUALLY ARRIVING at or beyond the pace management had indicated, while ALSO conveying that the development is still early, with most of its contribution ahead? Answer YES when management's own words convey, in whatever form fits the business, ONE coherent three-part pattern: (1) A PRIOR EXPECTATION MANAGEMENT ITSELF HAD SET. Management refers back — explicitly or in plain substance — to something about the growth of the business it had previously communicated or anticipated: a ramp, launch, recovery, adoption, expansion, capacity fill, customer conversion, or similar forward development it told investors was coming. The reference may be phrased in many ways ('as we said last quarter...', 'consistent with what we laid out...', 'we told you this would begin...', 'in line with the plan we described...'), so long as it concerns the business growing or inflecting — not a cost program, financing step, or routine housekeeping. (2) CURRENT REALITY IS NOW CONFIRMING IT. Management points to concrete activity in the just-reported period or happening now — actual orders, customers, volumes, shipments, deployments, utilization, openings, sign-ups, revenue from the new thing, or equivalent real events — as evidence that the anticipated development is materializing on schedule or faster/bigger than indicated. The confirmation must rest on things that already happened, described with enough substance that the arrival is observable rather than asserted. (3) MANAGEMENT SAYS IT IS STILL EARLY. Management conveys, directly or plainly in substance, that what has arrived so far is only the beginning of the development — the ramp is in its early innings, contribution to reported results is still small relative to what the same trajectory delivers ahead, further stages are already scheduled or in motion — so the reported numbers understate where the confirmed trajectory is already heading. The essence is ONE phenomenon: a management team that made a growth claim, is now standing in front of evidence that the claim is coming true, and is telling investors the verified trajectory has much further to run. The industry, the nature of the development, and the form of the evidence may vary widely. Answer NO if management describes promising developments with no indication it had previously set that expectation — a fresh announcement is not verification. NO if the look-back is only to beating financial guidance or consensus numbers, with no underlying operating development being confirmed. NO if the previously-promised item is a cost reduction, restructuring, refinancing, or housekeeping matter rather than a growth-bearing development. NO if the confirmation rests on pipeline, interest, letters of intent, or expectations rather than real current activity. NO if management indicates the development is now substantially complete or fully reflected in results, with little still ahead. NO if management is explaining that the anticipated development is late, smaller than expected, or being walked back. NO if the pattern appears only in an analyst's question or summary that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.