StocksO › OMC

Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) — Earnings Call X-Ray

Our AI read all 39 of OMC's earnings calls (2016–2025) and answered the same battery of questions about each one. Every past call is free; the newest quarter unlocks with a free account.

Latest Call Grade
🔒
Q2 2025 · sign up to see
Previous Call Grade
C
Q1 2025
Expected Move
🔒
next 45 days · members
Calls Analyzed
39
2016–2025
Avg Candor
6.8/9
evasion 3.1/9
Guidance LoweredHigh CandorSkeptic ReassuredCritic AmmunitionCutting Headcount

Call-by-call analysis

🔒 Q2 2025 earnings call 2025-07-15 NEWEST

Guidance: ■■■■■Demand: ■■■■■■ Margins: ■■■■Backlog: ■■■■ ■ analysts, ■■ questionsexpected move ±■■%
Candor /9
Specificity /9
Evasion /9
Stress /9

Management ■■■■■■ guidance against ■■■■■■■■ demand and ■■■■■■■ margins. The delivery was ■■■■■■■■ and ■■■■ in specifics, with ■■■ questions left hanging.

🔒 The Q2 2025 call grade is ready
The full 37-point AI read of OMC's newest earnings call — grade, expected move, and every question answered — is free with an account.
Sign up free to unlock

C Q1 2025 earnings call 2025-04-15

Management lowered guidance against mixed demand signals. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: loweredDemand: mixedMargins: stableHeadcount: cuttingCapex: flat 7 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 6/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q4 2024 earnings call 2025-02-04

Management held guidance steady against steady demand. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: stableHeadcount: cuttingCapex: increasing 7 analysts · 11 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 6/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q3 2024 earnings call 2024-10-15

Management held guidance steady against steady demand. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: stableBacklog: growingHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 7 analysts · 13 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growthHidden segment
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
YES Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q2 2024 earnings call 2024-07-16

Management held guidance steady against steady demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: stableHeadcount: cuttingCapex: increasing 9 analysts · 13 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Early product, fast growthHidden segment
Candor 7/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
YES Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
YES Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
YES Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
YES Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
YES Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q1 2024 earnings call 2024-04-16

Management raised guidance against steady demand and contracting margins. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: raisedDemand: stableMargins: contractingHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 7 analysts · 14 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubtsHidden segment
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 4/9
Confidence 8/9
Uncertainty 3/9
Promotion 5/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
YES Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
NO Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q4 2023 earnings call 2024-02-06

Management held guidance steady against steady demand. The delivery was rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: stableBacklog: growingPricing: stableHeadcount: growingCapex: increasing 7 analysts · 12 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts⚑ Reads rehearsed
Candor 6/9
Specificity 7/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 4/9
Promotion 6/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 5/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
NO Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
NO Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
NO Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

C+ Q3 2023 earnings call 2023-10-17

Management held guidance steady against steady demand. The delivery was unusually candid, rich in specifics.

Guidance: maintainedDemand: stableMargins: stablePricing: under pressureHeadcount: growingCapex: flat 5 analysts · 10 questions
⚑ Critic ammunition✓ Skeptic reassured⚑ Question left hanging✓ Guidance underwritable✓ Resolves doubts✓ Volume step-up ahead
Candor 7/9
Specificity 8/9
Evasion 3/9
Confidence 7/9
Uncertainty 5/9
Promotion 4/9
Stress 2/9
Complexity 4/9
All 20 questions our AI answered about this call
YES Would a skeptical short-seller find this call reassuring?
YES Would a careful investor underwrite management's guidance?
YES Is management's confidence proportionate to the evidence presented?
YES Does the call resolve more doubts than it creates?
YES Is there something a critic could fairly use against the company?
NO Is a claimed advantage dependent on scale they lack?
YES Does an obvious question remain unanswered?
NO Is a product early in its life but growing very fast?
NO Do they serve a small fraction of their addressable customers?
YES Is volume about to step up rather than grow gradually?
NO Are high fixed costs currently underutilised?
NO Is pricing recovering from a depressed level?
NO Do current results look bad while the direction looks better?
NO Are deferred revenue or customer prepayments growing?
YES Is consolidation happening among their peers?
NO Is a founder still running the company?
NO Does the final speaker sound like they are summarizing a finished story?
NO Is a fast-growing segment obscured by a declining one?
NO Does the CFO speak more than the CEO?
YES Does the call read rehearsed rather than lived?

Earlier calls

CallDateGradeGuidanceDemandMarginsCandorEvasion
Q2 2023 2023-07-18 B+ raisedmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q1 2023 2023-04-18 B+ maintainedstablestable 7/9 2/9
Q4 2022 2023-02-07 C maintainedstablestable 6/9 4/9
Q3 2022 2022-10-18 B+ raisedslowingstable 7/9 2/9
Q2 2022 2022-07-19 A raisedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2022 2022-04-19 A raisedacceleratingstable 7/9 2/9
Q4 2021 2022-02-08 B+ maintainedacceleratingstable 7/9 3/9
Q3 2021 2021-10-19 A raisedacceleratingexpanding 6/9 2/9
Q2 2021 2021-07-20 C+ maintainedacceleratingstable 6/9 4/9
Q1 2021 2021-04-20 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2020 2021-02-18 B+ maintainedacceleratingexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q3 2020 2020-10-27 C+ nonemixedexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q2 2020 2020-07-28 C maintainedslowingcontracting 7/9 4/9
Q1 2020 2020-04-28 F withdrawnslowingcontracting 7/9 5/9
Q4 2019 2020-02-11 C+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q3 2019 2019-10-15 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q2 2019 2019-07-17 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q1 2019 2019-04-16 B maintainedstableexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q4 2018 2019-02-12 C maintainedmixedexpanding 6/9 4/9
Q3 2018 2018-10-16 B maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2018 2018-07-17 D maintainedmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q1 2018 2018-04-17 C+ maintainedmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q4 2017 2018-02-15 C+ maintainedmixedstable 7/9 3/9
Q3 2017 2017-10-17 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q2 2017 2017-07-20 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 8/9 3/9
Q1 2017 2017-04-18 B maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q4 2016 2017-02-07 C+ maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 3/9
Q3 2016 2016-10-18 C+ maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 5/9
Q2 2016 2016-07-14 B maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 2/9
Q1 2016 2016-04-19 C maintainedmixedexpanding 7/9 4/9
Q4 2015 2016-02-09 B maintainedstableexpanding 7/9 2/9

How to read this page

The grade is a transparent composite of call quality — candor, specificity, low evasion, low stress, whether the call resolves more doubts than it creates, and the guidance action — not a buy or sell signal. The expected move is a volatility estimate from the one signal that survived our out-of-sample tests: how a stock's own reaction and pre-call volatility predict the size (not direction) of its next move. Full detail, including everything that failed: methodology.

Companies with similar call quality

AAP · Advance Auto Parts, Inc.ABCAF · Athabasca Minerals, Inc.ABDC · Alcentra Capital'sABMD · Abiomed, Inc.ABNRY · ABN AMRO Bank N.V.ABOS · Acumen Pharmaceuticals,

OMAM   All “O” companies    OMCL

Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.