Question Bank › Doing more and earning better on each one

Doing more and earning better on each one

Doing more and earning better on each one: volume and per-unit economics improving together, from the company's own acti

Calls Tested
424
Answered YES
73
Hit Rate
17.2%
rare by design

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) — this company's answers

NO on the Q4 2017 call 2018-02-16 B
The model's full reasoning — Q4 2017 call → NOWe need to determine if management conveys both: (1) volume of business rising now, and (2) per-unit economics improving due to company's own changes, presented together as current state. From transcript: Revenue growth 25% organic, strong demand, headcount up, utilization high. That's volume rising. Per-unit economics: They mention gross margin slightly down (38% vs 38.1% last year), non-GAAP operating margin 16.8% vs 16.4% last year, but that's overall. They talk about pricing opportunities, pyramid management, university program to bring in cheaper resources. They say "we do see some opportunities from pricing standpoint" and "ability to manage the pyramid" which suggests improving per-unit economics. But is it presented as already happening? They say "we feel comfortable with our ability to continue to manage" and "we do see some opportunities" - that's more forward-looking. Also they mention utilization high, but that's volume. They don't explicitly say that each unit is more profitable now due to company changes. They talk about wage inflation modest, but not that they've improved per-unit economics. They mention "we continue to invest" and "we think that we will see some greater efficiency in SG&A" - that's future. So the per-unit improvement is not clearly presented as already happening. They also mention that gross margin was slightly down, so not improving. They mention pricing opportunities but not that they've realized them. So answer NO. Also they mention "we are running a pretty high utilization" which is volume, but not per-unit economics. They talk about "we do see some opportunities from pricing standpoint" - that's potential. So no. Thus answer NO.

← Back to the full EPAM analysis

Show the exact prompt the model was given
Using ONLY the supplied earnings call transcript and no outside information: On this call, does management convey that TWO improvements are happening in the business AT THE SAME TIME, as one coherent present-tense story: (1) the company's volume of business is RISING NOW — more units, customers, orders, shipments, visits, projects, transactions, or activity in the recent period, in whatever form fits the business — AND (2) the economics or productivity OF EACH UNIT of that business are simultaneously GETTING BETTER because of changes the company itself has made — each order, customer, store, project, shipment, or transaction is now more profitable, cheaper to serve, faster to complete, higher-yielding, or otherwise more valuable to the company than the same unit used to be? Answer YES when management's own words convey BOTH halves as already observable in the current business, in whatever form fits the industry. The rising volume may appear as growing orders, customer counts, utilization, traffic, output, or activity described as happening now. The improving per-unit economics may appear in many forms: better margins or returns on each sale or project, lower cost or effort to produce or serve each unit, faster turnaround or throughput per asset or person, higher yield or attachment per transaction, newer business coming in on better terms than the old, or management explaining that growth is now converting to profit at a better rate than it used to. What matters is that management attributes the per-unit improvement mainly to things the company itself did — how it now operates, sells, produces, delivers, or selects its business — rather than to price increases passing through costs or to favorable market prices, and that management presents the two improvements together as the current state of the business, not as a plan or target. Answer NO if only one half is present — volume rising with flat or worsening per-unit economics, or improving efficiency while the business shrinks or merely holds flat. Answer NO if the per-unit improvement comes chiefly from raising prices to cover inflation, from favorable commodity or market prices the company receives, or from cutting the business back to its best pieces while overall activity declines. Answer NO if either half is only forecast, targeted, or hoped for rather than already showing. Answer NO if the improvement language is generic ("operating leverage," "efficiency gains," "profitable growth") without management conveying anything concrete about what is actually better per unit or what is actually growing. Answer NO if the idea appears only in an analyst's question or model that management does not itself affirm. Use only the supplied transcript. Answer only YES or NO.

Companies that answered YES

TickerCompanyCallDateCall grade
CRGO Freightos Limited Q1 2024 2024-05-20 C+
WRBY Warby Parker Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-09 A
AZEK The AZEK Company Inc. Q2 2024 2024-05-08 B+
CTRA Coterra Energy Inc. Q1 2024 2024-05-03 A
MNKD MannKind Corporation Q4 2023 2024-02-27 C
LILA Liberty Latin America Ltd. Q4 2023 2024-02-23 C
DASH DoorDash, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 C+
GRBK Green Brick Partners, Inc. Q3 2023 2023-11-01 B
BZUN Baozun Inc. Q2 2023 2023-08-28 D
IMAX IMAX Corporation Q2 2023 2023-07-26 B+
DAL Delta Air Lines, Inc. Q2 2023 2023-07-13 A
GVP GSE Systems, Inc. Q1 2023 2023-05-15 D
TGT Target Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-28 C
CNA CNA Financial Corporation Q4 2022 2023-02-06 B
SYY Sysco Corporation Q1 2023 2022-11-01 C+
TMCI Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-13 B+
DM Desktop Metal, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-08 F
FLR Fluor Corporation Q2 2022 2022-08-05 D
SGRY Surgery Partners, Inc. Q2 2022 2022-08-02 B+
UPWK Upwork Inc. Q2 2022 2022-07-27 C+
SE Sea Limited Q1 2022 2022-05-17 F
IRTC iRhythm Technologies, Inc. Q1 2022 2022-05-07 C+
ZENV Zenvia Inc. Q4 2021 2022-03-17 C+
OOMA Ooma, Inc. Q3 2022 2021-12-02 B+
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-30 A
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc. Q3 2021 2021-11-04 A
ADSK Autodesk, Inc. Q3 2019 2018-11-20 A
PRPO Precipio, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-11-19 D
UMH UMH Properties, Inc. Q3 2018 2018-11-02 C+
LRN Stride, Inc. Q1 2019 2018-10-23 B
AU AngloGold Ashanti's Q2 2018 2018-08-20 B
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation Q2 2018 2018-08-01 B
ORAN Orange SA Q2 2018 2018-07-26 B
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-07-26 A
HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company Q2 2018 2018-05-22 B+
LAUR Laureate Education, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-05-13 B+
NOVT Novanta Inc. Q4 2017 2018-05-12 B+
FSS Federal Signal Corporation Q1 2018 2018-05-12 A
BCOV Brightcove Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
ALLY Ally Financial Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-26 B+
HLX Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. Q1 2018 2018-04-24 B+
TOUR Tuniu Corporation Q4 2017 2018-03-14 D
UPLD Upland Software, Inc. Q4 2017 2018-03-08 C+
INST Instructure's Q4 2017 2018-02-12 B+
AVT Avnet, Inc. Q2 2018 2018-01-25 B
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Q4 2017 2018-01-16 A
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Q3 2017 2017-11-10 A
HOLX Hologic, Inc. Q4 2017 2017-11-08 D
RACE Ferrari N.V. Q3 2017 2017-11-02 C+
PII Polaris Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-24 C+
IBTX Independent Bank Group, Inc. Q3 2017 2017-10-24 A
BCE BCE Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-05 B+
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Q2 2017 2017-08-03 B
LEA Lear Corporation Q2 2017 2017-07-26 B+
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated Q2 2017 2017-06-08 B
BLKB Blackbaud, Inc. Q1 2017 2017-05-02 B+
DAN Dana Incorporated Q1 2017 2017-05-02 B
SHOO Steven Madden, Ltd. Q1 2017 2017-04-21 C
GPOR Gulfport Energy Corporation Q4 2016 2017-02-14 A
BP BP p.l.c. Q4 2016 2017-02-07 B+
BDC Belden Inc. Q4 2016 2017-02-02 B
WYY WidePoint Corporation Q3 2016 2016-11-09 D
SOHO Sotherly Hotels Inc. Q3 2016 2016-11-08 D
ULBI Ultralife Corporation Q3 2016 2016-10-29 C+
NDSN Nordson Corporation Q3 2016 2016-08-23 A
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. Q2 2016 2016-08-09 B+
ESE ESCO Technologies Inc. Q2 2016 2016-05-03 A
INGR Ingredion Incorporated Q1 2016 2016-05-01 B+
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Q1 2016 2016-04-29 C+
CAL Caleres, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-03-15 C+
HD The Home Depot, Inc. Q4 2015 2016-02-23 A
JHX James Hardie Industries plc Q3 2016 2016-02-19 B+
HXL Hexcel Corporation Q4 2015 2016-01-22 B+

How the model reasoned

SYY · Q1 2023 → YESThe question is whether management conveys TWO improvements happening AT THE SAME TIME: (1) volume of business RISING NOW, and (2) economics or productivity OF EACH UNIT getting BETTER due to company'...YES The transcript shows management describing both rising volume (sales +16.2%, U.S. Foodservice volume +7.3%, local case volume +5.4%, more than 1.4× market growth, net new customer wins) and improving per-unit economics (GP per case grew in all four 5th consecutive quarter; gross profit dollars per case increasing) as already occurring in the current quarter. They attribute the per-unit gains to company actions—strategic sourcing, team-based selling, Sysco Your Way service model, pricing tools, and supply-chain productivity improvements—while also noting inflation pass-through. Management presents these 2 improvements together as the present state of the business (not merely a target), even though OpEx productivity is still below historical levels and expected to improve later in the year. The answer is therefore YES. No other transcript section contradicts the dual improvement being conveyed as current. The question is answered YES.
IMAX · Q2 2023 → YESThe question is whether management conveys TWO improvements happening AT THE SAME TIME: (1) volume of business RISING NOW, and (2) economics or productivity OF EACH UNIT getting BETTER due to company ...YES The transcript shows both volume rising (signings up to 84 YTD vs 47 last year, installations doubled in Q2, box office +8% to $268M, revenue +32%) and per-unit economics improving (gross margins 59%, gross profit +31% with 15% growth 64% margin segment and 42% growth 36% margin segment, SG&A % of revenue down 700 bps to 33%, EBITDA margin 35.4%, driven by mix, profit flow-through, sales/hybrid arrangements, cost discipline, and operating leverage from company actions like programming and system mix). Management presents these as current state, not targets. So the answer is YES. The two improvements are happening simultaneously as described.
NDSN · Q3 2016 → YESThe question is: Does management convey that TWO improvements are happening at the same time: (1) volume of business is RISING NOW, and (2) the economics or productivity OF EACH UNIT are simultaneousl...YES Management describes both rising volume (6% sales growth, 4% organic, strong order rates, 22% backlog increase) and improving per-unit economics (operating margin up 3 points, gross margin up 2 points, incremental margin 77%, driven by volume leverage plus continuous improvement initiatives and the Nord business system) as already occurring in the current quarter. They attribute the per-unit gains mainly to company actions (new products, tiering, Nordson business system, restructuring-enabled improvements) rather than external prices or market conditions. The two improvements are presented together as the present state of the business.

More from the question bank

Better business coming in than going outExit rate above the printFrom explaining to teachingCompounding order flowBought-and-paid-for optionalityManagement teaches the multiplicationAll questions →
Not investment advice. Artul.ai publishes AI-generated earnings-call quality grades and expected-volatility estimates — never buy or sell recommendations. We tested over 1,600 predictive hypotheses against 165,000 transcripts; the honest result, including what failed, is documented in our methodology.